Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.0K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.0K
Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces01:24

Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces

4.0K
There are four fundamental forces in nature: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force. To compare the numerical strengths of the first two, take two particles of the same kind. Since electrons are fundamental particles, they are a good example.
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
4.0K
Comparison between RL and RC circuits01:24

Comparison between RL and RC circuits

6.1K
An RC circuit consists of resistance and capacitance, while in an RL circuit, capacitance is replaced by an inductor. RL and RC circuits are first-order differential circuits that store energy. An RC circuit stores energy in the electric field, while an RL circuit stores energy in the magnetic field. When connected to a battery, an RC circuit charges the capacitor, causing the current to decrease from maximum to zero upon being fully charged. This increases the voltage across the capacitor from...
6.1K
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids02:26

Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids

54.9K
Particles in a solid are tightly packed together (fixed shape) and often arranged in a regular pattern; in a liquid, they are close together with no regular arrangement (no fixed shape); in a gas, they are far apart with no regular arrangement (no fixed shape). Particles in a solid vibrate about fixed positions (cannot flow) and do not generally move in relation to one another; in a liquid, they move past each other (can flow) but remain in essentially constant contact; in a gas, they move...
54.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of metastatic pattern and histologic subtype on PD-(L)1 inhibitor efficacy in HER2-negative advanced gastric and gastroesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Author Correction: OR7A10 GPCR engineering boosts CAR-NK therapy against solid tumours.

Nature·2026
Same author

Veteran Satisfaction With Lung Cancer Screening Care: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.

Medical care·2026
Same author

Effect of Cannabis Use on Revision Surgery After Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same author

Connecting single-cell transcriptomes to projectomes in the mouse visual cortex.

Nature·2026
Same author

Identifying anaphylaxis using weakly-supervised prediction models and natural language processing.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
14:45

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

15.5K

Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted myomectomy.

Gaby N Moawad1, Paul Tyan2,3, Jiheum Paek4

  • 1Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. GNMoawad@gmail.com.

Journal of Robotic Surgery
|January 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) offers comparable outcomes to robotic multiport myomectomy (RMM) for selected patients. Both minimally invasive approaches demonstrate low complication rates for uterine fibroid removal.

Keywords:
Minimally invasive myomectomyRobotic myomectomySingle-site myomectomySingle-site surgery

More Related Videos

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
08:34

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy

Published on: January 2, 2026

541
Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
07:30

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation

Published on: July 19, 2021

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
14:45

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Published on: September 28, 2019

15.5K
Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
08:34

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy

Published on: January 2, 2026

541
Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
07:30

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation

Published on: July 19, 2021

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgery aims to reduce port incisions for better patient outcomes.
  • Robotic surgery offers advanced visualization and dexterity for complex procedures.
  • Uterine fibroids are common, often requiring surgical intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) versus robotic multiport myomectomy (RMM).
  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RSSM in a selected patient cohort.
  • To assess patient satisfaction and recovery associated with single-site versus multiport robotic myomectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Multicenter retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification III) across three university hospitals.
  • Comparison of 80 consecutive RSSM patients with 95 matched RMM patients based on tumor burden.
  • Key outcome measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, overnight admission, and post-operative complications.

Main Results:

  • Demographics differed significantly in mean age and BMI between RSSM and RMM groups.
  • Pre-operative fibroid characteristics (size, number) were similar between cohorts.
  • After covariate adjustment, RSSM and RMM showed comparable EBL, operative time, overnight admission rates, and post-operative complications.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic single-site myomectomy is equivalent to robotic multiport myomectomy in selected patients.
  • Both surgical approaches are associated with low rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications.
  • Minimizing port incisions through RSSM may enhance patient satisfaction without compromising safety or efficacy.