Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
Classification, categorization and essential items for digital ulcer evaluation in systemic sclerosis: a
J Blagojevic1, S Bellando-Randone2, G Abignano3,4
1Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, and Department of Geriatric Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Scleroderma Unit AOUC, Villa Monna Tessa, viale Pieraccini 18, 50139, Florence, Italy. jelena308@hotmail.com.
Systemic sclerosis patients’ digital ulcers (DUs) need better evaluation tools. A study found three essential DU items and preferred new classifications for clinical use in systemic sclerosis (SSc) management.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Dermatology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- A consensus exists for defining digital ulcers (DUs) in systemic sclerosis (SSc), but evaluation, classification, and categorization methods are lacking.
- This study aimed to identify essential DU evaluation items and assess proposed classification and categorization systems for SSc patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify essential items for digital ulcer (DU) evaluation in systemic sclerosis (SSc).
- To assess the utility and feasibility of existing DU classification systems in clinical practice.
- To investigate the preference for a new DU categorization (episodic, recurrent, chronic) over a simple recurrent/not recurrent distinction.
Main Methods:
- The DeSScipher European multicentre study, specifically observational trial 1 (OT1) on DU management, surveyed EUSTAR centres.
- Online questionnaires assessed the completion rate of essential DU items and gathered feedback on the feasibility and usefulness of proposed DU classifications and categorizations.
Main Results:
- Eighty-four EUSTAR centres (56.8%) responded, identifying the number of DUs with tissue loss, recurrent DUs, and new DUs as essential evaluation items (≥70% agreement).
- The proposed DU classification was deemed useful and feasible by 65% of centres.
- A significant majority (80%) preferred the new episodic, recurrent, and chronic DU categorization over the simple recurrent/not recurrent distinction.
Conclusions:
- EUSTAR centres identified three key items for DU evaluation in SSc clinical practice.
- The proposed DU classification and categorization systems were considered useful and feasible, warranting further implementation and validation.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Classification of Systems-II
Surveys
Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Compounds Essential to Human Function
Inorganic Compounds Essential to Human Functioning
Inorganic compounds essential to human functioning include water, salts, acids, and bases. These compounds are inorganic, i.e., they do not have a carbon-hydrogen bond. Water...

