Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation
Published on: October 15, 2021
Intracerebral hemorrhage outcome: A comprehensive update
João Pinho1, Ana Sofia Costa2, José Manuel Araújo1
1Neurology Department, Hospital de Braga, Portugal.
Insights
Non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) significantly impacts global health, causing more disability than ischemic stroke. Understanding ICH outcomes, including mortality and quality of life, is crucial for patient care.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) presents a substantial global health burden, exceeding ischemic stroke in disability-adjusted life years lost.
- High early case fatality rates, up to 40%, have historically focused ICH outcome assessment on mortality.
- Predictors of early ICH mortality include age, neurological impairment severity, hemorrhage volume, and antithrombotic use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes.
- To highlight the multifaceted nature of long-term ICH outcome assessment.
- To emphasize the importance of integrating predictive scores with clinical judgment in managing ICH patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) outcomes.
- Analysis of factors influencing both early mortality and long-term patient well-being.
- Evaluation of validated scoring systems for predicting ICH prognosis.
Main Results:
- Early ICH mortality is influenced by patient age, neurological deficit, hemorrhage size, and antithrombotic medication.
- Long-term outcomes encompass mortality, functional status, quality of life, cognitive function, psychiatric health, seizures, and recurrent events.
- Validated scores aid in predicting ICH mortality and functional outcomes but require clinical judgment.
Conclusions:
- Comprehensive understanding of ICH outcomes, beyond mortality, is essential for effective patient management.
- Healthcare professionals need updated perspectives on ICH prognosis to guide shared decision-making with patients and families.
- Individualized patient care requires combining validated prognostic tools with clinical expertise.
Abstract:
Non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with a significant global burden of disease, and despite being proportionally less frequent than ischemic stroke, in 2010 it was associated with greater worldwide disability-adjusted life years lost. The focus of outcome assessment after ICH has been mortality in most studies, because of the high early case fatality which reaches 40% in some population-based studies. The most robust and consistent predictors of early mortality include age, severity of neurological impairment, hemorrhage volume and antithrombotic therapy at the time of the event. Long-term outcome assessment is multifaceted and includes not only mortality and functional outcome, but also patient self-assessment of the health-related quality of life, occurrence of cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, epileptic seizures, recurrent ICH and subsequent thromboembolic events. Several scores which predict mortality and functional outcome after ICH have been validated and are useful in the daily clinical practice, however they must be used in combination with the clinical judgment for individualized patients. Management of patients with ICH both in the acute and chronic phases, requires health care professionals to have a comprehensive and updated perspective on outcome, which informs decisions that are needed to be taken together with the patient and next of kin.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Schemas
Hindsight Biases
Self-Discrepancy Theory

