Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Unveiling Radiosensitive and Radioresistant Genes
Published on: May 23, 2025
Multiple-gene targeting and mismatch tolerance can confound analysis of genome-wide pooled CRISPR screens
Jean-Philippe Fortin1, Jenille Tan2, Karen E Gascoigne2
1Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, 94080, CA, USA. fortin946@gmail.com.
Background:
Genome-wide loss-of-function screens using the CRISPR/Cas9 system allow the efficient discovery of cancer cell vulnerabilities. While several studies have focused on correcting for DNA cleavage toxicity biases associated with copy number alterations, the effects of sgRNAs co-targeting multiple genomic loci in CRISPR screens have not been discussed.
Results:
In this work, we analyze CRISPR essentiality screen data from 391 cancer cell lines to characterize biases induced by multi-target sgRNAs. We investigate two types of multi-targets: on-targets predicted through perfect sequence complementarity and off-targets predicted through sequence complementarity with up to two nucleotide mismatches. We find that the number of on-targets and off-targets both increase sgRNA activity in a cell line-specific manner and that existing additive models of gene knockout effects fail at capturing genetic interactions that may occur between co-targeted genes. We use synthetic lethality between paralog genes to show that genetic interactions can introduce biases in essentiality scores estimated from multi-target sgRNAs. We further show that single-mismatch tolerant sgRNAs can confound the analysis of gene essentiality and lead to incorrect co-essentiality functional networks. Lastly, we also find that single nucleotide polymorphisms located in protospacer regions can impair on-target activity as a result of mismatch tolerance.
Conclusion:
We show the impact of multi-target effects on estimating cancer cell dependencies and the impact of off-target effects caused by mismatch tolerance in sgRNA-DNA binding.
Insights
CRISPR screens can be biased by single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting multiple genes. This study reveals how multi-target sgRNAs and off-target effects from sequence mismatches impact cancer dependency analysis.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Cancer Biology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- CRISPR/Cas9 screens are powerful tools for identifying cancer vulnerabilities.
- Previous research has addressed DNA cleavage toxicity biases but not sgRNA multi-targeting effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze biases in CRISPR essentiality screens caused by multi-target single guide RNAs (sgRNAs).
- To investigate the impact of on-target and off-target binding on sgRNA activity and gene essentiality analysis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of CRISPR essentiality screen data from 391 cancer cell lines.
- Characterization of on-targets (perfect complementarity) and off-targets (up to two mismatches).
- Utilizing synthetic lethality between paralog genes to identify biases.
Main Results:
- Multi-target sgRNAs increase sgRNA activity in a cell line-specific manner.
- Existing models fail to capture genetic interactions between co-targeted genes, introducing bias.
- Single-mismatch tolerant sgRNAs and SNPs in protospacer regions can confound gene essentiality analysis and network construction.
Conclusions:
- Multi-target effects significantly impact the estimation of cancer cell dependencies.
- Off-target effects due to mismatch tolerance in sgRNA-DNA binding can lead to erroneous conclusions in CRISPR screens.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
CRISPR
CRISPR and crRNAs
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

