Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

21.3K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.3K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

23.3K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
23.3K
Introduction to Statistics01:17

Introduction to Statistics

63.5K
The science of statistics involves collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data. The method of collecting, organizing, and summarizing data is called descriptive statistics. The systematic method of drawing inferences from the sample data and predicting unknown characteristics of a population is called inferential statistics.
In statistics, the collection of individuals or objects under study is called population. The idea of sampling is to select a portion of the larger population...
63.5K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

16.5K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
16.5K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

1.4K
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minds, morality, and the red hand rule: facilitating resource-rational agreement through policy.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Replicability and generalizability of the repeated exposure effect on moral condemnation of fake news.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries - the TISP dataset.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Learning from and about scientists: Consensus messaging shapes perceptions of climate change and climate scientists.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Dynamic computational phenotyping of human cognition.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same journal

Language switches can be monitored but not fully controlled: Eye-tracking evidence for syntax-driven language control.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond discrete categories in motor cognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Decoding time from space: A review of the complication clock and its representation of temporal experience.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.1K

A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation.

Rahul Bhui1

  • 1Departments of Psychology and Economics & Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, 52 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. rbhui@g.harvard.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|January 27, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People may overthink or underthink decisions, spending too much or too little time deliberating. This study introduces a new method to test if individuals optimally balance decision time with potential benefits, revealing insights into decision-making rationality.

Keywords:
Decision makingOptimalityResponse timeSequential sampling modelsSpeed-accuracy tradeoff

More Related Videos

Dispersion of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media: Towards Protocol Optimization
09:35

Dispersion of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media: Towards Protocol Optimization

Published on: December 25, 2017

29.3K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.1K
Dispersion of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media: Towards Protocol Optimization
09:35

Dispersion of Nanomaterials in Aqueous Media: Towards Protocol Optimization

Published on: December 25, 2017

29.3K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Decision-making theories often assume optimal deliberation time.
  • Individuals may not always allocate time efficiently, leading to overthinking or underthinking.
  • Understanding optimal time allocation is crucial for analyzing rationality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and implement a method for precisely determining optimal deliberation time.
  • To account for individual preferences in time allocation during decision-making.
  • To enable a more comprehensive analysis of rationality in decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel test to evaluate the consistency of time preferences under changing incentives.
  • Applied the test to two motion discrimination experiments.
  • Varied task difficulty and monetary incentives to assess optimality.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the ability of the test to reveal departures from optimal deliberation time.
  • Identified instances where individuals may not be optimally balancing time costs and decision benefits.
  • Provided empirical evidence on the conditions influencing optimal time allocation.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method offers a precise way to assess optimal deliberation time.
  • Findings suggest that individuals may not always optimize their decision-making time.
  • This research contributes to a deeper understanding of rationality in economic and psychological contexts.