Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
External Validation of the MEESSI Acute Heart Failure Risk Score: A Cohort Study
Desiree Wussler1, Nikola Kozhuharov1, Zaid Sabti2
1University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (D.W., N.K., J.W., I.S., L.S., P.B., R.T., K.W., C.P., J.D., S.S., O.S., D.F., T.N., J.B., C.S., O.P., T.B., C.M.).
Background:
The MEESSI-AHF (Multiple Estimation of risk based on the Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with AHF) score was developed to predict 30-day mortality in patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF) to emergency departments (EDs) in Spain. Whether it performs well in other countries is unknown.
Objective:
To externally validate the MEESSI-AHF score in another country.
Design:
Prospective cohort study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01831115).
Setting:
Multicenter recruitment of dyspneic patients presenting to the ED.
Participants:
The external validation cohort included 1572 patients with AHF.
Measurements:
Calculation of the MEESSI-AHF score using an established model containing 12 independent risk factors.
Results:
Among 1572 patients with adjudicated AHF, 1247 had complete data that allowed calculation of the MEESSI-AHF score. Of these, 102 (8.2%) died within 30 days. The score predicted 30-day mortality with excellent discrimination (c-statistic, 0.80). Assessment of cumulative mortality showed a steep gradient in 30-day mortality over 6 predefined risk groups (0 patients in the lowest-risk group vs. 35 [28.5%] in the highest-risk group). Risk was overestimated in the high-risk groups, resulting in a Hosmer-Lemeshow P value of 0.022. However, after adjustment of the intercept, the model showed good concordance between predicted risks and observed outcomes (P = 0.23). Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses that used multiple imputation for missing values in the overall cohort of 1572 patients.
Limitations:
External validation was done using a reduced model. Findings are specific to patients with AHF who present to the ED and are clinically stable enough to provide informed consent. Performance in patients with terminal kidney failure who are receiving long-term dialysis cannot be commented on.
Conclusion:
External validation of the MEESSI-AHF risk score showed excellent discrimination. Recalibration may be needed when the score is introduced to new populations.
Primary Funding Source:
The European Union, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University of Basel, and University Hospital Basel.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
07:41Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Published on: March 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
01:21Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
01:21Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
01:29Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
01:29Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
01:17Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
01:27Heart Failure I: Introduction