Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

371
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
371

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Guiding steps for a student-focused academic-practice partnership: Building clinical nursing capacity.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing·2026
Same author

The Effectiveness of the Advanced Cardiac Life Support System for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Care.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2025
Same author

Caffeine Supplementation Is Beneficial for the Pulling Performance of Indoor Tug-of-War Athletes.

Biology·2025
Same author

Proteostasis and lysosomal repair deficits in transdifferentiated neurons of Alzheimer's disease.

Nature cell biology·2025
Same author

Nurses' work environment and health promotion in relation to psychological distress symptoms, and sleep disturbance: A structural equation modeling approach.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing·2024
Same author

In situ analysis reveals the TRiC duty cycle and PDCD5 as an open-state cofactor.

Nature·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
10:38

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens

Published on: February 1, 2020

7.9K

The Effect of Barcode Technology Use on Pathology Specimen Labeling Errors.

Mei-Hua Yu, Ting-Ting Lee, Mary Etta Mills

    AORN Journal
    |January 30, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary

    Barcode technology significantly reduced pathology specimen labeling errors, improving patient safety. Nurses found the net benefits highly satisfying, despite some system quality concerns, enhancing overall satisfaction with the technology.

    Keywords:
    barcode technologynursing satisfactionpathology specimen collectionspecimen identification errorsspecimen labeling

    More Related Videos

    Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology
    11:20

    Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology

    Published on: March 21, 2018

    11.4K
    Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
    07:26

    Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology

    Published on: August 22, 2022

    2.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

    DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
    10:38

    DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens

    Published on: February 1, 2020

    7.9K
    Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology
    11:20

    Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology

    Published on: March 21, 2018

    11.4K
    Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
    07:26

    Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology

    Published on: August 22, 2022

    2.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical laboratory science
    • Healthcare informatics
    • Patient safety research

    Background:

    • Pathology specimen labeling errors pose risks to patient safety.
    • Accurate specimen identification is critical for correct diagnosis and treatment.
    • Existing labeling methods are susceptible to human error.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the effectiveness of barcode technology in reducing pathology specimen labeling errors.
    • To assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of barcode system implementation.
    • To determine the impact of barcode technology on patient safety and user satisfaction.

    Main Methods:

    • A barcode system was implemented in a teaching hospital in Taiwan.
    • Sixty-eight perioperative nurses completed surveys on system quality, information quality, service quality, user satisfaction, and net benefits.
    • Pathology specimen records were analyzed pre- and post-implementation.

    Main Results:

    • Specimen management errors significantly decreased after barcode system implementation.
    • Nurses reported high satisfaction with the net benefits of the barcode system.
    • System quality was identified as a factor contributing to dissatisfaction.

    Conclusions:

    • Barcode technology is an effective tool for improving pathology specimen labeling accuracy.
    • Implementation of reliable barcode systems can enhance patient safety.
    • Addressing system quality issues is important for maximizing user satisfaction with healthcare technologies.