Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Ex Vivo Infection of Live Tissue with Oncolytic Viruses
Published on: June 25, 2011
In Vivo Imaging of Oncolytic Measles Virus Propagation with Single-Cell Resolution
Iris Kemler1, Matthew K Ennis1, Claudia M Neuhauser2
1Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Abstract:
Recombinant measles viruses (MVs) have oncolytic activity against a variety of human cancers. However, their kinetics of spread within tumors has been unexplored. We established an intravital imaging system using the dorsal skin fold chamber, which allows for serial, non-invasive imaging of tumor cells and replication of a fusogenic and a hypofusogenic MV. Hypofusogenic virus-infected cells were detected at the earliest 3 days post-infection (dpi), with peak infection around 6 dpi. In contrast, the fusogenic virus replicated faster: infected cells were detectable 1 dpi and cells were killed quickly. Infection foci were significantly larger with the fusogenic virus. Both viruses formed syncytia. The spatial relationships between cells have a major influence on the outcome of therapy with oncolytic viruses.
Insights
Recombinant measles viruses (MVs) show promise for cancer therapy. This study reveals how fusogenic and hypofusogenic MVs spread in tumors, impacting treatment outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Virology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Recombinant measles viruses (MVs) demonstrate oncolytic activity against various human cancers.
- The kinetics of MV spread within tumors remain largely unexplored, hindering therapeutic optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the tumor cell infection and spread kinetics of fusogenic and hypofusogenic recombinant measles viruses (MVs).
- To understand the influence of viral fusogenicity and spatial cell relationships on oncolytic virus therapy outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Establishment of an intravital imaging system using the dorsal skin fold chamber for serial, non-invasive monitoring.
- Infection and replication analysis of both fusogenic and hypofusogenic MVs in tumor models.
- Quantification of infected cell kinetics, infection foci size, and syncytia formation.
Main Results:
- Hypofusogenic MV-infected cells were detected at 3 days post-infection (dpi), peaking at 6 dpi.
- Fusogenic MV replicated faster, with detectable infection at 1 dpi and rapid cell killing.
- Fusogenic MV resulted in significantly larger infection foci compared to hypofusogenic MV; both formed syncytia.
Conclusions:
- Viral fusogenicity significantly impacts the kinetics of tumor cell infection and spread by recombinant measles viruses.
- The spatial arrangement of tumor cells plays a crucial role in the efficacy of oncolytic virus therapy.
- Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing more effective measles virus-based cancer treatments.
Related Concept Videos
What are Viruses?
Propagation of Waves
Consider a scenario where a wave propagates from a string of low linear mass density to a string of high linear mass density. In such a case, the reflected wave is out of phase with respect to the incident wave, however the...
Propagation of Action Potentials
Neurons (nerve cells) have a resting membrane potential, with a slightly negative charge inside compared to outside. This is maintained by ion channels, such as sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) channels, which control the flow of ions. When a stimulus, like a touch or a signal from another neuron, triggers the neuron, sodium channels open, allowing sodium ions to...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves

