Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Stomata Tape-Peel: An Improved Method for Guard Cell Sample Preparation
Published on: July 15, 2018
Can Meaning at Work Guard Against the Consequences of Objectification?
1Département de psychologie, Universite Paul-Valery Montpellier, Route de Mende, Montpellier, France.
Abstract:
Objectification at work reflects instrumentality and denial of humanness in work relationships. These relationships have deleterious consequences for workplace health. One of the consequences of this type of relationship is self-objectification in which the self is perceived as a non-person or as an object. This phenomenon leads to perceiving oneself without mental states (i.e., dementalization) or as an instrument (i.e., instrumentalization) and as a nonperson (i.e., loss of humanness). However, few studies have considered how to reduce these consequences. In this study, we examine the protective role of meaning at work against the consequences of objectification. A total of 153 employees answered an online questionnaire which measured objectification, meaning of work, mentalization, and instrumentality/humanness. The results highlight an impact of objectification on instrumentality and humanness but not on mentalization as in previous studies. There is also a moderation effect of the meaning of work on the relationship between objectification and humanness. These results lead us to consider instrumentality, humanness, and dementalization as separate constructs accounting for self-objectification.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Third Law of Thermodynamics
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Egoism and Altruism
Internal Energy

