Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
An artificial neural network model for clinical score prediction in Alzheimer disease using structural neuroimaging
Nikhil Bhagwat1, Jon Pipitone1, Aristotle N. Voineskos1
1From the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Que. (Bhagwat, Chakravarty); the Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Research Lab, Research Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont. (Bhagwat, Pipitone, Voineskos); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Voineskos); and the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Chakravarty), Canada.
Background:
The development of diagnostic and prognostic tools for Alzheimer disease is complicated by substantial clinical heterogeneity in prodromal stages. Many neuroimaging studies have focused on case–control classification and predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease, but predicting scores from clinical assessments (such as the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale or the Mini Mental State Examination) using MRI data has received less attention. Predicting clinical scores can be crucial in providing a nuanced prognosis and inferring symptomatic severity.
Methods:
We predicted clinical scores at the individual level using a novel anatomically partitioned artificial neural network (APANN) model. The model combined input from 2 structural MRI measures relevant to the neurodegenerative patterns observed in Alzheimer disease: hippocampal segmentations and cortical thickness. We evaluated the performance of the APANN model with 10 rounds of 10-fold cross-validation in 3 experiments, using cohorts from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): ADNI1, ADNI2 and ADNI1 + 2.
Results:
Pearson correlation and root mean square error between the actual and predicted scores on the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADNI1: r = 0.60; ADNI2: r = 0.68; ADNI1 + 2: r = 0.63) and Mini Mental State Examination (ADNI1: r = 0.52; ADNI2: r = 0.55; ADNI1 + 2: r = 0.55) showed that APANN can accurately infer clinical severity from MRI data.
Limitations:
To rigorously validate the model, we focused primarily on large cross-sectional baseline data sets with only proof-of-concept longitudinal results.
Conclusion:
The APANN provides a highly robust and scalable framework for predicting clinical severity at the individual level using high-dimensional, multimodal neuroimaging data.
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...

