Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Developing a Salivary Antibody Multiplex Immunoassay to Measure Human Exposure to Environmental Pathogens
Published on: September 12, 2016
[Definitionof anti-pertussis antibodies by immunoassay.]
T A Skirda1, O Yu Borisova1, M S Petrova1
1G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, 125212, Moscow, Russia.
Abstract:
Comparative analysis of efficiency of identification the anti-pertussis of antibodies of three classes (IgM, IgG, IgA) by means of four commercial test systems used for serological diagnosis of whooping cough in the Russian Federation by RIDASCREEN (R-Biohharm AG, Германия), NOVATEC (Immunodiagnostica GmbH, Germany), DRG Diagnostics (Germany), Savyon Diagnostics (Israel) is carried out. The research included 42 serums of blood of the children and adults with whooping cough hospitalized in Infectious diseases clinical hospital No. 1 of the Moscow Department of Healthcare. In work the commercial test systems - RIDASCREEN (r-Biofarm, Germany), NOVATEC (Germany), DRG (Germany), Savyon (Israel) are used, according to instructions of producers. Complete coincidence of results of a research is established in 40,5% cases, in 42,9% not complete coincidence of results on dynamics of development of one class of antibodies is revealed and in 9,5% cases the discrepancy of results on two classes of antibodies is revealed. In total discrepancies of results - 7,1%. At determination of antibodies of the class IgM in serum of blood of patients with whooping cough the greatest number of positive results is defined in the SAVYON - 83,3±6,3% (35 serums), NOVATEC - 71,4±8,2% (30 serums), RIDASCREEN - 61,9±9,7% (26 serums), DRG - 45,2±11,7% (19 serums). Class IgG antibodies in all test systems were defined at one level. Some distinctions took place in determination of IgA. The high percent of identification of IgA was in the RIDASCREEN - 59,5±10,0% (25 serums) and DRG - 50,0±11,2% (21 serums). In the NOVATEC and SAVYON this percent was lower - 45,2±11,7% and 26,2±13,9%, respectively (19 and 11 serums). Thus, the research showed that for serological researches any of these 4 test systems can be used. It is recommended to conduct diagnostic testings of serums of blood in one chosen test system for obtaining comparable results and to interpret the results received in one test system when obtaining doubtful results it is necessary to investigate serums in dynamics at the same time in one test system.
Related Concept Videos
Definite Integral
Definition of z-Transform
Properties of Definite Integral I
The Precise Definition of a Limit
Properties of Definite Integral II
Integration by Parts: Definite Integrals

