Design and Implementation of a Face-to-Face Peer Feedback Program for Ambulatory Nursing
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
Published on: May 25, 2013
Jennifer Ryiz-Semmel1, Monique France, Robin Bradshaw
1Author Affiliations: Clinical Nurse (Ms Ryiz-Semmel), Infectious Diseases & Immunology; Clinical Nurse (Ms France), Craniofacial Team; Nurse Practitioner (Ms Bradshaw), Orthopedics; Clinical Nurse (Ms Khan), Orthopedics; Clinical Nurse (Ms Mulholland), Neurosurgery; Nursing Director (Ms Meucci), Medical/Surgical Department; and Director Vice Dean for Faculty Excellence (Dr McGrath), University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, School of Nursing.
Background/Purpose:
Ongoing dissatisfaction with anonymous peer feedback led to problem solving to equip nurses to provide and receive respectful and meaningful feedback during face-to-face peer review.
Problem:
Giving and receiving feedback about other's performance and collaboration are a vital aspect of teambuilding; yet, no programmatic training existed to prepare and equip nurses to feel confident and comfortable in providing or receiving face-to-face peer feedback. A search of the literature demonstrated a dearth of evidence related to developing these teambuilding relationships. The facilitator role appeared in some literature outside nursing but was poorly articulated and yet appeared important to the process.
Methods:
This was a quality improvement project that utilized online surveys with both multiple-choice and open-ended questions for data collection across 3 time points for 2 different cohorts over a 2-year implementation period. Strategies included education related to providing feedback with positive intent regardless of feedback type. A facilitator role was used to ensure effective communication and provide support to the peers during the process.
Results:
Nurse participants described increased comfort and knowledge related to providing/receiving face-to-face feedback. Training and use of a facilitator provided the necessary support; 75% of participants reported comfort with giving face-to-face feedback. However, the greater majority, 80% to 92%, of participants reported increased comfort with receiving face-to-face feedback.
Conclusions:
Using active peer-to-peer support has become an accepted standard for face-to-face peer feedback as an aspect of the annual review process.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Feedback Inhibition
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Feedback Loops
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....

