Children in Social Research: Do Higher Payments Encourage Participation in Riskier Studies?

Stephanie Taplin1, Jenny Chalmers2, Bianca Hoban1

  • 11 Australian Catholic University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Insights

In the MESSI study, payments increased participation of children in social research. Higher payments correlated with higher participation, with no evidence of undue influence, but risk levels should guide payment decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Research Ethics
  • Child Psychology

Background:

  • Ethical considerations are paramount when involving children and young people in research.
  • Understanding factors influencing participation is crucial for recruitment and ethical conduct.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of payment amounts on the participation of Australian children and young people in social research of varying sensitivity.
  • To assess whether financial incentives constitute undue influence on participation decisions.

Main Methods:

  • The study, MESSI (Managing Ethical Studies on Sensitive Issues), utilized hypothetical scenarios presented through online surveys.
  • Participants were presented with different payment levels (no payment, prize draw, $30, $100, $200) for hypothetical research tasks of varying sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Children and young people were more likely to participate in lower sensitivity research across all payment levels.
  • Offering payments significantly increased the likelihood of participation, with higher payments generally leading to higher participation rates.
  • No evidence of undue influence was found, suggesting payments can ethically enhance recruitment.

Conclusions:

  • Financial incentives can effectively increase participation rates among children and young people in social research.
  • Ethical research practices can incorporate payments without undue influence, provided the level of risk is the primary consideration.
  • Payment levels should be carefully calibrated based on the sensitivity and potential risks associated with the research.

Related Concept Videos

Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K