Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
Changes in General and Specific Psychopathology Factors Over a Psychosocial Intervention
Matthew P Constantinou1, Ian M Goodyer2, Ivan Eisler3
1Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.
Objective:
Recent research suggests that comorbidity in child and adolescent psychiatric symptoms can be summarized by a single latent dimension known as the p factor and more specific factors summarizing clusters of symptoms. This study investigated within- and between-person changes in general and specific psychopathology factors over a psychosocial intervention.
Method:
A secondary analysis was conducted of the Systemic Therapy for At-Risk Teens study, a pragmatic randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of multisystemic therapy with those of management as usual for decreasing antisocial behavior in 684 adolescents (82% boys; 11-18 years old at baseline) over an 18-month period. The general p factor and specific antisocial, attention, anxiety, and mood factors were estimated from a symptom-level analysis of a set of narrowband symptom scales measured repeatedly during the study. General and specific psychopathology factors were assessed for reliability, validity, and within- and between-person change using a parallel process multilevel growth model.
Results:
A revised bi-factor model that included a general p factor and specific anxiety, mood, antisocial, and attention factors with cross-loadings fit the data best. Although the factor structure was multidimensional, the p factor accounted for most of the variance in total scores. The p factor, anxiety, and antisocial factors predicted within-person variation in external outcomes. Furthermore, the p factor and antisocial factors showed within-person declines, whereas anxiety showed within-person increases, over time. Despite individual variation in baseline factor scores, adolescents showed similar rates of change.
Conclusion:
The bi-factor model is useful for teasing apart general and specific therapeutic changes that are conflated in standard analyses of symptom scores.
Clinical Trial Registration Information:
START (Systemic Therapy for At Risk Teens): A National Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate Multisystemic Therapy in the UK Context; http://www.isrctn.com; ISRCTN77132214.
More Related Videos
06:39Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
11:33Monitoring the Assembly of a Secreted Bacterial Virulence Factor Using Site-specific Crosslinking
Published on: December 17, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Transcription Factors
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Transcription Elongation Factors
The transcription elongation is regulated via pausing of RNA polymerase on several occasions during transcription. In bacteria, these halts are necessary because the transcription of DNA into mRNA is coupled to the translation of that mRNA...