Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishment and Confirmation of a Postnatal Right Ventricular Volume Overload Mouse Model
Published on: June 9, 2023
Comparison of early postnatal prediction models for survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Mehtab K Sekhon1, Stephen J Fenton2, Bradley A Yoder3
1Division of Neonatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. maggie.sekhon@hsc.utah.edu.
Objective:
To compare the PF-PCO2 equation-partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) minus partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2)-to three other tools for postnatal prediction of survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).
Study Design:
A retrospective analysis of 203 infants with CDH from 1 January 2003 to 30 June 2018. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed for survival and secondary outcomes of survival without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO) and death despite ECMO. Predictive scores were calculated to determine cutoff for PF-PCO2 score.
Results:
The PF-PCO2 tool had the highest AUC (0.84 for survival, 0.92 for survival without ECMO, and 0.83 for death despite ECMO). PF-PCO2 best predicted survival when >-60 and survival without ECMO when >+80. There was no optimal cutoff score for death despite ECMO.
Conclusion:
The PF-PCO2 tool best predicted postnatal survival in infants with CDH.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

