Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

A Continuous-flow Photocatalytic Reactor for the Precisely Controlled Deposition of Metallic Nanoparticles
Published on: April 10, 2019
High-throughput analysis of photocatalytic reactivity of differing TiO2 formulations using 96-well microplate
1School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005, USA.
Abstract:
The rapid development of photocatalysts for water decontamination benefits from availability of sensitive platforms for screening photocatalytic reactivity. The standard approach typically involves quantifying the degradation of a single dye compound in a slurry system in individual beakers, which requires tedious photocatalyst separation and long operation time. We present a simple and efficient method for assessing the photocatalytic activity of different photocatalyst nanomaterials that eliminates the solid separation process. The 96-well microplate method demonstrated an improved applicability as a high-throughput screening method for photocatalytic reaction mechanisms using a wide range of chemical substrates (i.e., methyl orange, methylene blue, terephthalic acid, and β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide coenzyme) and photocatalyst concentrations (1-100 mg/L). By employing photocatalysts at lower concentrations compared to the slurry system, rapid screening was accomplished through direct spectrophotometric or spectrofluorometric measurements. The mass-normalized rate constants of dye degradation were used to determine the photocatalytic reactivity of three commercial TiO2 nanomaterials, which followed an order of SRM TiO2 1898 ≈ Degussa TiO2 P90 > Food-grade TiO2 E171. The extent of hydroxyl radical involvement in methyl orange degradation was estimated to be ∼74% by using radical scavengers in the microplate reactor. Given the utilization of low-concentration photocatalyst, this protocol may be used for evaluating photocatalytic reactivity and oxidative stress caused by photocatalyst exposure in an aquatic environment. We further evaluated photocatalytic reaction kinetics with respect to energetic and photonic efficiency. The method could greatly facilitate comparisons across different laboratories when quantifying photocatalytic reactivity and efficiency, which would aid in standardizing bench-scale photocatalysis testing.
Related Concept Videos
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Cross-reactivity
Reactivity of Enols

