Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Quantification of Fungal Colonization, Sporogenesis, and Production of Mycotoxins Using Kernel Bioassays
Published on: April 23, 2012
Evaluation of Mycotoxin Screening Tests in a Verification Study Involving First Time Users
Veronica M T Lattanzio1, Christoph von Holst2, Vincenzo Lippolis3
1Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy, Via Amendola, 122/O, 70126 Bari, Italy. veronica.lattanzio@ispa.cnr.it.
This study validated methods for detecting deoxynivalenol (DON) and aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) in grains. All tested methods proved fit-for-purpose, accurately distinguishing contaminated samples from negative controls with low false suspect rates.
Area of Science:
- Food safety analysis
- Mycotoxin detection
- Analytical chemistry
Background:
- Accurate detection of mycotoxins like deoxynivalenol (DON) and aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) in food commodities is crucial for public health.
- Standardized and validated analytical methods are essential for reliable screening and regulatory compliance.
- Training courses often utilize established screening methods, but their performance by first-time users needs evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of lateral flow devices (LFDs) and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) for DON and AFB₁ detection in maize and wheat.
- To determine intermediate precision (RSDip) and false suspect rates for the evaluated analytical methods.
- To confirm that first-time users can achieve performance comparable to established validation studies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat using lateral flow devices (LFDs).
- Analysis of aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) in maize using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).
- Calculation of intermediate precision (RSDip) and false suspect rates based on inter-analyst variability and repeatability.
Main Results:
- Intermediate precision (RSDip) ranged from 6.5% to 30% for DON and 16% to 33% for AFB₁.
- The highest variances were observed in AFB₁ analyses due to lower mass fractions.
- False suspect rates were below 0.1% for all tested methods, demonstrating high specificity.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated methods exhibited a fit-for-purpose performance profile for mycotoxin screening.
- The methods effectively distinguished samples containing analytes at the screening target concentration (STC) from negative controls.
- First-time users achieved method performances consistent with previous validation studies, validating the training course effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests
Antigens Involved in Adaptive Immunity
Complete Antigens
Complete antigens possess both immunogenicity and...
Testes: Histology
The spermatogenic cells, responsible for producing sperm, are...
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...

