Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Electrospinning Growth Factor Releasing Microspheres into Fibrous Scaffolds
Published on: August 16, 2014
Mechanistic Evaluation of the Opposite Effects on Initial Burst Induced by Two Similar Hydrophilic Additives From
1College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nanjing Tech University, School of Pharmaceutical Science, No. 30 Puzhu South Road, Nanjing 211816, China.
Abstract:
The purpose of the present study was to make a detailed comparison of 2 similar additives about their opposite effects on the initial burst of octreotide acetate from poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres. We focused on identifying the key factor that influenced the initial burst of microspheres induced by small hydrophilic additives. The apparent reason resulting in such differences was different pore closing rates on the surface of these 2 batches. However, the potential mechanism was still unknown. To compare with the single-additive system, these 2 additives were coencapsulated together into the same formulation. Of surprise, the inhibition effect of glucose on burst release somehow disappeared and even turned out to be opposite. This phenomenon greatly reminds us that there must be some interactions between glucose and polymer, which are likely to be disturbed by coencapsulated CaCl2. However, small amount of additive can hardly make any detected difference. Therefore, additive-loaded microspheres without drug were prepared to further investigate the potential factors. Under this condition, differences were found. The key factor for glucose-induced accelerated pore closure and reduction in initial burst was the formation of hydrogen bonds between the glucose molecule and the polymer matrix.
Related Concept Videos
Initiation of Translation
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Initiation of Translation
Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Conjugate Addition of Enolates: Michael Addition
Transcription Initiation
The promoters and enhancers and their accessory proteins allow tight regulation of...

