Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM
Kayla Robinson1, Hui Li1, Li Lan1
1Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, MC 2026, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
This study developed a two-stage radiomic texture analysis method (RACE) to create robust breast cancer risk signatures. The RACE method improves classifier generalizability across different mammography vendors by prioritizing reproducible features.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Radiomic texture analysis typically relies on homogeneous imaging conditions, which differ from real-world clinical variability.
- This limitation impacts the generalizability of radiomic signatures across different mammography equipment vendors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a two-stage radiomic texture analysis method to create robust texture signatures applicable across various mammography unit vendors.
- To assess the impact of feature reproducibility on the generalizability of radiomic signatures for breast cancer risk classification.
Main Methods:
- A two-stage method, Robustness Assessment, Classification Evaluation (RACE), was developed using full-field digital mammograms from two vendors (Hologic, GE).
- Stage one identified reproducible features across vendors using hierarchical clustering and robustness metrics.
- Stage two constructed radiomic signatures using stepwise feature selection and QDA for breast cancer risk classification, evaluating generalizability via inter- and intravendor performance.
Main Results:
- Generalizability of radiomic signatures decreased monotonically with increased feature robustness criteria (fewer reproducible features).
- Intervendor classification performance was significantly higher with the RACE method compared to ComBat harmonization alone.
- No significant difference in performance was observed between ComBat followed by RACE and either ComBat or RACE alone.
Conclusions:
- The proposed RACE method effectively constructs robust radiomic signatures for breast cancer risk assessment, demonstrating improved generalizability across mammography vendors.
- Feature robustness is crucial for enhancing classifier generalizability in diverse mammography datasets.
- Harmonization methods like ComBat show potential utility in classification schemes and warrant further investigation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chromatographic Methods: Classification
Chromatographic techniques are typically named by...
Methods of Classification and Identification
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Classification of Neurotransmitters
Classification of Leukocytes
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...

