Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Validation of two accelerated 4D flow MRI sequences at 3 T: a phantom study.
Sebastian Ebel1, Lisa Hübner2, Benjamin Köhler3
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Centre, Leipzig Strümpellstrasse 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany. sebastian.ebel@icloud.com.
Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI offers accurate flow volume and velocity measurements comparable to standard 2D flow MRI. Accelerated 4D techniques, particularly k-t-GRAPPA5, significantly reduce scan time without compromising accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI with parallel imaging aims to shorten scan times while maintaining image quality and accuracy compared to 2D flow MRI.
- This study evaluates accelerated 4D flow MRI sequences against standard 2D flow MRI using a flow phantom at 3 Tesla.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy, reproducibility, and scan times of two accelerated 4D flow MRI sequences (GRAPPA2 and k-t-GRAPPA5) against standard 2D flow MRI.
- To assess the impact of velocity encoding (Venc) and measuring plane alignment on flow measurements in both 2D and 4D flow MRI.
Main Methods:
- Two accelerated 4D flow MRI sequences (GRAPPA2, k-t-GRAPPA5) and a standard 2D flow MRI sequence were tested on a flow phantom with constant and pulsatile flow.
- Flow volumes and velocities were analyzed using custom software "Bloodline", with calculated phantom flow used as the reference standard.
- Evaluated parameters included concordance of flow volumes/velocities, reproducibility, and dependency on measuring plane and Venc.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in flow volume or velocity were observed between 2D, 4D flow MRI sequences, and the pump reference for both continuous and pulsatile flow.
- All sequences demonstrated excellent correlation (R=0.99-1.0) with the reference standard and excellent reproducibility (R=0.99).
- Overestimation of Venc had no impact; however, misaligned planes caused underestimation in 2D flow MRI but not in 4D flow MRI. k-t-GRAPPA5 scan time (1:54 min) was significantly shorter than GRAPPA2 (3:56 min).
Conclusions:
- Both accelerated 4D flow MRI sequences provide accurate flow measurements comparable to 2D flow MRI, unaffected by Venc overestimation or plane misalignment.
- The highly accelerated k-t-GRAPPA5 sequence achieves results similar to GRAPPA2 but with a substantial reduction in scan time.
- 4D flow MRI offers a robust and efficient alternative to 2D flow MRI for cardiovascular flow assessment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Velocity and Acceleration in Steady and Unsteady Flow
The acceleration can be generalized to any point in the flow, and expressed as components along three perpendicular directions, representing changes in velocity over...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Reliability and Validity
Accelerators
The effectiveness of calcium chloride can...
Average Acceleration
Instantaneous Acceleration

