Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Polyelectrolyte Complex for Heparin Binding Domain Osteogenic Growth Factor Delivery
Published on: August 22, 2016
Comparing Anti-Factor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Levels for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin
Rebekah A Wahking1, Rachel H Hargreaves2, Sean M Lockwood2
11 Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Monitoring intravenous heparin (IV heparin) with anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels, instead of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), required higher doses but was safe and effective in veterans. This transition improved anticoagulation monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) are common laboratory tests for monitoring intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV heparin).
- Emerging evidence suggests anti-Xa levels may offer a more precise assessment of anticoagulation compared to aPTT.
- The Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System adopted anti-Xa monitoring in January 2017, shifting from aPTT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transitioning from aPTT to anti-Xa monitoring for IV heparin.
- To compare the IV heparin doses needed to achieve therapeutic goals between aPTT and anti-Xa monitoring protocols.
- To assess secondary outcomes including time to therapeutic goal, time within therapeutic range, and adverse events like bleeding.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study design was employed.
- Patients receiving IV heparin for at least 24 hours were divided into two groups: aPTT monitoring (August 2016–January 2017) and anti-Xa monitoring (February 2017–July 2017).
- Data on heparin dosage, time to therapeutic range, and adverse events were collected and compared.
Main Results:
- A total of 155 patients were analyzed.
- The anti-Xa group required significantly higher IV heparin doses to reach the therapeutic goal compared to the aPTT group.
- Despite higher doses, the anti-Xa group required fewer IV heparin rate adjustments, and monitoring was not linked to increased adverse events, including bleeding.
Conclusions:
- Higher IV heparin doses are necessary to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels in the veteran population transitioning from aPTT monitoring.
- The shift to anti-Xa monitoring for IV heparin appears to be a safe and effective practice in this patient cohort.
- Further research may be warranted to fully understand the implications in the largely unstudied veteran population.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Factors Affecting Solubility
Partial Fractions
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Drug's Physicochemical Properties and Plasma Levels
One important factor is the drug's molecular size. The kidneys readily excrete smaller molecules below 300 Daltons (Da). On the other hand, molecules weighing between 300 and 500 Da are excreted through both urine and bile. Larger molecules above 500 Da tend to be excreted...

