Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems: Analysis of Similarity in Progress Notes from Consecutive
Abigail E Huang1,2, Michelle R Hribar2, Isaac H Goldstein3
1Ophthalmology, VA Portland, OR.
Abstract:
Content importing technology enables duplication of large amounts of clinical text in electronic health record (EHR) progress notes. It can be difficult to find key sections such as Assessment and Plan in the resulting note. To quantify the extent of text length and duplication, we analyzed average ophthalmology note length and calculated novelty of each major note section (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan, Other). We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive note pairs and found that the average encounter note was 1182 ± 374 words long and less than a quarter of words changed between visits. The Plan note section had the highest percentage of change, and both the Assessment and Plan sections comprised a small fraction of the full note. Analysis of progress notes by section and unique content helps describe physician documentation activity and inform best practices and EHR design recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Purpose of Health Records II
Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
Data Reporting and Recording
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

