Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Phase Diagram Characterization Using Magnetic Beads as Liquid Carriers
Published on: September 4, 2015
Solid-Liquid-Liquid Wettability of Surfactant-Oil-Water Systems and Its Prediction around the Phase Inversion Point
Aurelio Stammitti-Scarpone1, Edgar J Acosta1
1Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , M5S3E5 , Canada.
Abstract:
Surfactant-oil-water (SOW) systems are important for numerous applications, including hard surface cleaning, detergency, and enhanced oil-recovery applications. There is limited literature on the wettability of solid-liquid-liquid (SLL) systems around the surfactant phase inversion point (PIP), and the few references that exist point to wettability inversion accompanying the microemulsion (μE) phase inversion. Despite the significance of this phenomenon and the extreme changes in contact angles, there are no models to predict SLL wettability as a function of proximity to the PIP. Recent works on SLL wettability in surfactant-free systems suggest that SLL contact angles can be predicted with an extension of Neumann's equation of state (e-EQS) if the interfacial tension (IFT or γo-w) is known and if there is a good estimate for the interfacial energy between the wetting phase and the surface (γS-wetting liquid). In this work, IFT predictions for SOW systems around the PIP were obtained via the combined hydrophilic-lipophilic difference (HLD) and net-average-curvature (NAC) framework. To test the hypothesis that the combined HLD-NAC + e-EQS can predict wettability inversion around the PIP, with a given γS-μE, the contact angles (measured through the light oil phase, θO) for the μE of sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate-toluene-saline water system were measured on high surface free energy (SFE) materials (glass, stainless steel, and mica) and on polytetrafluoroethylene (low SFE) around the PIP. Considering that at the PIP, most systems have a contact angle of 90°, an estimated γS-μE = 1/4γo-w@PIP was found to be suitable for the systems considered in this work and for systems presented in the literature. The largest deviations between the predictions and the experimental values were found in the positive HLD range (surfactant in the light oil phase). Although there is room for improvement, this framework can estimate the wetting behavior of SOW systems starting solely from formulation parameters.
More Related Videos
06:31Studying Surfactant Effects on Hydrate Crystallization at Oil-Water Interfaces Using a Low-Cost Integrated Modular Peltier Device
Published on: March 18, 2020
08:08Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Cancer-cell Proteomes Derived From Liquid and Solid Tumors
Published on: February 27, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Speed of Sound in Solids and Liquids
Phase Diagrams
States of Water
Water freezes when the intermolecular forces are greater than the kinetic energy. Unlike most other substances, water is less dense in its solid state than in its liquid state. This is because each water molecule can form...
Phase Transitions
Rise of Liquid in a Capillary Tube