Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Methods to Evaluate Cytotoxicity and Immunosuppression of Combustible Tobacco Product Preparations
Published on: January 10, 2015
Addressing Tobacco Use in Underserved Communities Through a Peer-Facilitated Smoking Cessation Program
Jummai Apata1, Payam Sheikhattari2,3, Lisa Bleich4
1ASCEND Center for Biomedical Research, Morgan State University, 1700 E. Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA.
The Communities Engaged and Advocating for a Smoke-Free Environment (CEASE) program improved tobacco cessation for underserved populations using a community-based participatory research approach. Peer-led counseling with incentives enhanced participation but not cessation rates.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Community Health
- Tobacco Control
Background:
- The Communities Engaged and Advocating for a Smoke-Free Environment (CEASE) program is a university-community partnership targeting tobacco use reduction in underserved populations.
- The CEASE program has evolved through four phases, incorporating lessons learned to enhance intervention outcomes.
- Phase II focused on refining the community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, varying incentives, settings, and providers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the CBPR approach of the CEASE tobacco cessation program.
- To report the results of Phase II of the CEASE intervention.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different incentives and peer-led counseling in a community setting.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods study utilizing the Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach.
- Recruitment of 398 smokers into two 12-session group counseling interventions facilitated by trained peers.
- Comparison of two study arms differing in incentive types, with follow-up at 12 weeks.
Main Results:
- A 21% smoking cessation rate was observed at 12-week follow-up.
- The program achieved a 51.9% retention rate (attendance at ≥6 sessions).
- No significant differences in cessation outcomes were found between the two incentive-based study arms; incentives increased participation but not cessation.
Conclusions:
- The CBPR approach, particularly the peer-led model in Phase II, showed improved outcomes compared to clinician-led Phase I.
- Monetary and non-monetary incentives effectively increased program participation but did not significantly impact smoking cessation.
- The CBPR approach enhances the acceptability and effectiveness of cessation services for underserved populations.
Related Concept Videos
What are Populations and Communities?
Facilitated Transport
Facilitated Transport
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Social Facilitation
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....

