Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects
Daria Proklova1, Daniel Kaiser2, Marius V Peelen3
1The Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.
Abstract:
Human high-level visual cortex shows a distinction between animate and inanimate objects, as revealed by fMRI. Recent studies have shown that object animacy can similarly be decoded from MEG sensor patterns. Which object properties drive this decoding? Here, we disentangled the influence of perceptual and categorical object properties by presenting perceptually matched objects (e.g., snake and rope) that were nonetheless easily recognizable as being animate or inanimate. In a series of behavioral experiments, three aspects of perceptual dissimilarity of these objects were quantified: overall dissimilarity, outline dissimilarity, and texture dissimilarity. Neural dissimilarity of MEG sensor patterns was modeled using regression analysis, in which perceptual dissimilarity (from the behavioral experiments) and categorical dissimilarity served as predictors of neural dissimilarity. We found that perceptual dissimilarity was strongly reflected in MEG sensor patterns from 80 ms after stimulus onset, with separable contributions of outline and texture dissimilarity. Surprisingly, when controlling for perceptual dissimilarity, MEG patterns did not carry information about object category (animate vs inanimate) at any time point. Nearly identical results were found in a second MEG experiment that required basic-level object recognition. This is in contrast to results observed in fMRI using the same stimuli, task, and analysis approach: fMRI voxel patterns in object-selective cortex showed a highly reliable categorical distinction even when controlling for perceptual dissimilarity. These results suggest that MEG sensor patterns do not capture object animacy independently of perceptual differences between animate and inanimate objects.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Reflection of Waves
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

