Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
The AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Reactions and Use by Residency Programs During the 2018 Application Cycle
Fiona E Gallahue1, Katherine M Hiller, Steven B Bird
1F.E. Gallahue is associate professor and director, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. K.M. Hiller is professor and director of undergraduate education, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona. S.B. Bird is program director, Department of Emergency Medicine, and vice chair for education, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. M.R.C. Haas is a medical education fellow, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. N.M. Deiorio is associate dean for student affairs and professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia. H.G. Hern is associate clinical professor, University of California, San Francisco, and vice chair of education, Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Oakland, California. Z.J. Jarou is clinical associate, Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. A. Pierce is associate professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. T. Geiger is senior selection research analyst, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C. L. Fletcher is an intern, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C.
Emergency medicine programs cautiously used the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Standardized Video Interview (SVI) scores and videos. Many sought further research on utility and expressed interest in future use.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Residency Admissions
- Applicant Evaluation
Background:
- The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) introduced the Standardized Video Interview (SVI) to enhance residency application review.
- Understanding program director perceptions and usage patterns of the SVI is crucial for its effective implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate emergency medicine residency programs' perceptions and utilization of AAMC Standardized Video Interview (SVI) total scores and video responses.
- To assess how these tools were integrated into the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) 2018 application cycle.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted: a program director survey (Study 1) and an analysis of SVI video response usage data (Study 2).
- Study 1 assessed user reactions after the SVI's first operational year, while Study 2 examined actual program usage via the AAMC Program Director's Workstation.
Main Results:
- Survey results (71% response rate) indicated programs viewed SVI videos for curiosity and to understand score ranges, favoring applicants from U.S. MD schools and those with higher USMLE Step 1 scores.
- No significant differences in video viewing were observed based on gender or race/ethnicity.
- Many programs unsure about incorporating SVI scores desired more research on utility, yet over half expressed likelihood to use SVI scores and videos in the future.
Conclusions:
- Program director feedback on SVI utility and ease of use was mixed, with cautious adoption in selection processes aligning with AAMC recommendations.
- Future surveys are planned to monitor AAMC's progress in improving user acceptance and familiarity with the SVI.
Related Concept Videos
Standard Entropy Change for a Reaction
The Water Cycle
The Phosphorus Cycle
The Born-Haber Cycle
Half-life of a Reaction
The Citric Acid Cycle

