Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Blast Quantification Using Hopkinson Pressure Bars
Published on: July 5, 2016
Tunnel millisecond-delay controlled blasting based on the delay time calculation method and digital electronic
Xiaoming Guan1, Caixia Guo2, Ben Mou1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, P.R. China.
Optimizing millisecond-delay blasting with digital electronic detonators significantly reduces tunnel vibration. A new calculation method for delay times prioritizes rock breakage and wave cancellation, achieving up to a 69.70% velocity reduction.
Area of Science:
- Civil Engineering
- Mining Engineering
- Geotechnical Engineering
Background:
- Tunnel blasting generates significant vibrations, impacting surrounding structures and the environment.
- Traditional blasting methods often lack precise control over delay timing, leading to suboptimal rock fragmentation and increased seismic effects.
- Digital electronic detonators offer enhanced precision for millisecond-level delay timing in blasting operations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for calculating optimal delay times for cut, easer, and periphery holes in tunnel blasting.
- To analyze the effects of delay timing on rock breakage, wave superposition, and vibration reduction.
- To validate the proposed method through field tests and application in a tunnel project.
Main Methods:
- Formulating delay time calculation based on rock breakage and wave superposition theory.
- Developing specific delay time formulas for different hole types (cut, easer, periphery).
- Conducting field tests to analyze vibration velocities, rock breaking, and wave cancellation with varying delay times.
- Comparing vibration characteristics between digital electronic detonators and non-electronic detonators.
Main Results:
- Optimal delay time of 5 ms for cut holes achieved effective rock breakage and wave cancellation, reducing vibration velocity to 0.46-0.51 cm/s.
- Delay times of 6 ms or longer for cut holes compromised rock breakage effectiveness.
- Optimal delay times for easer and periphery holes were also determined to be 5 ms.
- Vertical peak particle velocity decreased by 69.70% (from 2.974 cm/s to 0.901 cm/s) using digital electronic detonators with optimized delay times.
Conclusions:
- Prioritizing rock breakage and free surface formation, followed by wave superposition cancellation, is crucial for optimizing delay times.
- The proposed delay time calculation method is accurate and effective for reducing tunnel blasting vibrations.
- Digital electronic detonators, coupled with optimized millisecond delay timing, offer a significant advantage in vibration mitigation for tunnel construction.
Related Concept Videos
Titration Calculations: Weak Acid - Strong Base
For the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M CH3CO2H with 0.100 M NaOH, the reaction can be represented as:
Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever:
Electronic Structure of Atoms
An atom comprises protons and neutrons, which are contained inside the dense, central core called the nucleus, with electrons present around the nucleus. Taking into account the wave–particle duality of electrons and the uncertainty in position around the nucleus, quantum mechanics provides a more accurate model for the atomic structure. It describes atomic orbitals as the regions around the nucleus where electrons of discrete energy exist, characterized by four quantum...
Titration Calculations: Strong Acid - Strong Base
A titration is carried out for 25.00 mL of 0.100 M HCl (strong acid) with 0.100 M of a strong base NaOH. The pH at different volumes of added base solution can be calculated as follows:
(a) Titrant volume = 0 mL. The solution pH is due to the acid ionization of HCl. Because this is a strong acid, the ionization is complete and the hydronium ion molarity is 0.100 M. The pH of the solution is then:
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
Vibrating Concrete

