Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

243
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
243
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.9K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.9K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.5K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.2K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.2K
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

636
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
636
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.0K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PREVALENCE OF DIGITAL DERMATITIS IN EUROPEAN BISON (<i>BISON BONASUS</i>) IN SWITZERLAND AND REFERENCE TO OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES.

Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians·2026
Same author

Simultaneous occurrence of hyphaema and <i>Streptococcus dysgalactiae</i>-bacteraemia in free-ranging Swiss laying hens.

Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A·2026
Same author

Control Group Selection in Preclinical Rat Bone Defect Models: A Systematic Review.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2026
Same author

Retrospective Analysis of Persistent Clonal Salmonella enterica Strains of Various Serovars in Commercial Swiss Broiler Farms.

MicrobiologyOpen·2025
Same author

Successful implementation of a risk assessment and mitigation program to control bovine digital dermatitis at the herd-level.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The Effect of Compost-Bedded Pack Barns on Claw Health and Lameness in Dairy Herds in Southern Germany.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
12:08

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Published on: April 22, 2020

9.1K

Automatic lameness detection in cattle.

Maher Alsaaod1, Mahmoud Fadul1, Adrian Steiner1

  • 1Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Veterinary Journal (London, England : 1997)
|March 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated lameness detection systems in dairy cows are advancing, using kinematic, kinetic, and indirect methods. Further research is needed for early detection systems to improve animal welfare and farm productivity.

Keywords:
Automated lameness detectionCattleLocomotion scoreWelfare

More Related Videos

Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG
09:35

Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG

Published on: March 10, 2017

9.7K
Cryopreservation of Preimplantation Embryos of Cattle, Sheep, and Goats
11:10

Cryopreservation of Preimplantation Embryos of Cattle, Sheep, and Goats

Published on: August 5, 2011

31.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
12:08

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Published on: April 22, 2020

9.1K
Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG
09:35

Automatic Detection of Highly Organized Theta Oscillations in the Murine EEG

Published on: March 10, 2017

9.7K
Cryopreservation of Preimplantation Embryos of Cattle, Sheep, and Goats
11:10

Cryopreservation of Preimplantation Embryos of Cattle, Sheep, and Goats

Published on: August 5, 2011

31.3K

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Science
  • Animal Welfare
  • Agricultural Technology

Background:

  • Modern dairy farming requires enhanced health and welfare monitoring.
  • Innovative techniques are crucial for improving animal behavior monitoring and welfare indicators.
  • Automated lameness detection systems need to be valid, reliable, and practical for farm use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current automated systems for detecting lameness in cattle.
  • To assess the development and application of these systems in dairy research and practice.
  • To categorize automatic lameness detection methods.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of automated lameness detection systems.
  • Categorization of methods into kinematic, kinetic, and indirect approaches.
  • Evaluation of system performance against reference standards (locomotion/lesion scores) using a development level scheme (I-IV).

Main Results:

  • Automated lameness detection methods are broadly classified into kinematic, kinetic, and indirect categories.
  • Studies have extensively covered sensor techniques (Level I), algorithm validation (Level II), and performance for detection (Level III).
  • No studies have yet reached Level IV, focusing on decision support with early warning systems.

Conclusions:

  • Early identification of lame cows through automated systems offers a return on investment for herd managers.
  • Long-term studies utilizing validated automated lameness detection systems are essential.
  • Further research is needed to advance early lameness detection for improved animal welfare and production in field conditions.