Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.8K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.8K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Attribution01:26

Attribution

274
In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
274
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

168
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
168
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

350
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
350
Interpreting Run Charts01:25

Interpreting Run Charts

3.1K
Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment Preferences among Patients with Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in France, Spain, China, South Korea, and Japan: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

MDM policy & practice·2025
Same author

Do Patient Preferences and Treatment Beliefs Explain Patterns of Antihypertensive Medication Nonadherence? A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2025
Same author

Do Patients Think it's Worth Waiting for a Kidney? Evidence from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.

The patient·2025
Same author

Quantifying Patient Preferences About Features of Nonstatin Lipid-Lowering Therapies: A Discrete Choice Experiment in the United States.

Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes·2025
Same author

Transferability of Preferences; for Better or ….?

The patient·2025
Same author

Self-stigmatization and treatment preferences: Measuring the impact of treatment labels on choices for depression medications.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Should Qualitative Researchers in Health and Medicine be Concerned About Replication?

The patient·2026
Same journal

Experiences of People with Type 2 Diabetes and Healthcare Professionals with Once-Weekly Insulin Efsitora Alfa in QWINT Phase 3 Trials: Qualitative In-Trial Interviews.

The patient·2026
Same journal

Probabilistic Attribute Presentation in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review of Current Practice.

The patient·2026
Same journal

Expanding Access to Oral Contraceptive Pills: Do Consumers Prefer Over-the-Counter Availability?

The patient·2026
Same journal

Patient Preferences and Treatment Decision Drivers in IDH-Mutant Grade 2 Glioma: An International Discrete Choice Experiment.

The patient·2026
Same journal

Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-Y-5L Parent-Proxy Version Among Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

The patient·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

A Technical Guide for Performing Spectroscopic Measurements on Metal-Organic Frameworks
10:13

A Technical Guide for Performing Spectroscopic Measurements on Metal-Organic Frameworks

Published on: April 28, 2023

3.0K

A Guide to Measuring and Interpreting Attribute Importance.

Juan Marcos Gonzalez1

  • 1Duke University, 200 Morris St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA. jm.gonzalez@duke.edu.

The Patient
|March 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Attribute importance measures from stated-preference methods can vary. This study emphasizes transparent reporting of calculations for accurate interpretation and comparison of medical intervention preferences.

More Related Videos

Measuring and Interpreting Oxygen Consumption Rates in Whole Fly Head Segments
07:11

Measuring and Interpreting Oxygen Consumption Rates in Whole Fly Head Segments

Published on: January 7, 2019

16.1K
Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography for Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring
11:28

Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography for Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

A Technical Guide for Performing Spectroscopic Measurements on Metal-Organic Frameworks
10:13

A Technical Guide for Performing Spectroscopic Measurements on Metal-Organic Frameworks

Published on: April 28, 2023

3.0K
Measuring and Interpreting Oxygen Consumption Rates in Whole Fly Head Segments
07:11

Measuring and Interpreting Oxygen Consumption Rates in Whole Fly Head Segments

Published on: January 7, 2019

16.1K
Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography for Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring
11:28

Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography for Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Stated-preference (SP) methods, including discrete-choice experiments (DCE) and best-worst scaling (BWS), are widely used to assess preferences for medical intervention attributes.
  • Attribute importance is a key metric derived from SP methods, but its calculation and interpretation can be inconsistent.
  • Variations in attribute importance measures arise from differing elicitation methods, question contexts, and normalization approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the potential consequences of inconsistent attribute importance measures in SP studies.
  • To advocate for increased transparency in the calculation and reporting of attribute importance.
  • To improve the interpretability and comparability of preference data across different studies and subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • This article is a conceptual review and discussion piece.
  • It analyzes the sources of variation in attribute importance measures within SP methods.
  • It emphasizes the need for clear documentation of methodological choices.

Main Results:

  • Attribute importance measures are sensitive to methodological choices in SP studies.
  • Inconsistent reporting complicates the interpretation of preference data and subgroup comparisons.
  • Lack of transparency can lead to inaccurate conclusions about patient preferences.

Conclusions:

  • Transparent reporting of how attribute importance is calculated is crucial for valid interpretation.
  • Clear methodological descriptions enable accurate comparisons of preference results across studies and samples.
  • Standardized reporting practices will enhance the reliability and utility of SP research in healthcare decision-making.