Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.1K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.1K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

21.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.3K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

22.4K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
22.4K
Introduction to Statistics01:17

Introduction to Statistics

63.0K
The science of statistics involves collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data. The method of collecting, organizing, and summarizing data is called descriptive statistics. The systematic method of drawing inferences from the sample data and predicting unknown characteristics of a population is called inferential statistics.
In statistics, the collection of individuals or objects under study is called population. The idea of sampling is to select a portion of the larger population...
63.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predict this: Minimal commitments for testable predictive processing explanations.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Inconsistent use of evolutionary frameworks in accounts of romantic relationships.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Estimating Consent Clarity Requires Sampling Absence, Refusal, and Withdrawal.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

35+ years of the additional singleton task: Design features and guidelines.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.8K

Statistical regularities bias overt attention.

Benchi Wang1, Iliana Samara2, Jan Theeuwes2

  • 1Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. wangbenchi.swift@gmail.com.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|March 29, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical learning helps the brain suppress frequently appearing distractor locations, reducing interference with target search. This study confirms location suppression and faster attention disengagement due to statistical learning.

Keywords:
Attentional captureOculomotor suppressionRapid disengagement hypothesisSpatial priority mapStatistical regularities

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.8K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.5K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Previous studies suggest statistical learning can suppress frequently cued distractor locations.
  • An alternative explanation is faster attentional disengagement from high-probability distractor locations.
  • The current study aimed to differentiate between these hypotheses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether statistical learning leads to suppression of high-probability distractor locations.
  • To examine if faster attentional disengagement contributes to reduced interference from predictable distractors.
  • To understand the neural plasticity underlying attentional selection through statistical learning.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a variant of the additional singleton task adapted for eye tracking.
  • Participants performed a speeded saccade task with a manual response.
  • A singleton distractor was presented more frequently at one specific location.

Main Results:

  • Fewer saccades were directed towards the high-probability distractor location compared to other locations.
  • Saccade latencies to targets were longer when targets appeared at the high-probability distractor location.
  • Evidence for faster disengagement from high-probability distractors was found, though it was a smaller effect.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the hypothesis that statistical learning induces suppression of high-probability distractor locations.
  • Plasticity in the spatial priority map of attentional selection is induced by statistical learning.
  • The brain actively suppresses predictable distractor locations to improve target search efficiency.