A comparison of static and dynamic ∆B0 mapping methods for correction of CEST MRI in the presence of temporal B0 field variations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
Published on: February 9, 2017
Esau Poblador Rodriguez1, Philipp Moser1, Barbara Dymerska2
1High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Purpose:
To assess the performance, in the presence of scanner instabilities, of three dynamic correction methods which integrate ∆B0 mapping into the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) measurement and three established static ∆B0 -correction approaches.
Methods:
A homogeneous phantom and five healthy volunteers were scanned with a CEST sequence at 7 T. The in vivo measurements were performed twice: first with unaltered system frequency and again applying frequency shifts during the CEST acquisition. In all cases, retrospective voxel-wise ∆B0 -correction was performed using one intrinsic and two extrinsic [prescans with dual-echo gradient-echo and water saturation shift referencing (WASSR)] static approaches. These were compared with two intrinsic [using phase data directly generated by single-echo or double-echo GRE (gradient-echo) CEST readout (CEST-GRE-2TE)] and one extrinsic [phase from interleaved dual-echo EPI (echo planar imaging) navigator (NAV-EPI-2TE)] dynamic ∆B0 -correction approaches [allowing correction of each Z-spectral point before magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) analysis].
Results:
All three dynamic methods successfully mapped the induced drift. The intrinsic approaches were affected by the CEST labeling near water (∆ω < |0.3| ppm). The MTRasym contrast was distorted by the frequency drift in the brain by up to 0.21%/Hz when static ∆B0 -corrections were applied, whereas the dynamic ∆B0 corrections reduced this to <0.01%/Hz without the need of external scans. The CEST-GRE-2TE and NAV-EPI-2TE resulted in highly consistent MTRasym values with/without drift for all subjects.
Conclusion:
Reliable correction of scanner instabilities is essential to establish clinical CEST MRI. The three dynamic approaches presented improved the ∆B0 -correction performance significantly in the presence of frequency drift compared to established static methods. Among them, the self-corrected CEST-GRE-2TE was the most accurate and straightforward to implement.
Related Concept Videos
Static, Stagnation, Dynamic and Total Pressure
What is Variation?
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
Distance Corrections
Static Equilibrium - I
Static Equilibrium - II
Static Friction
For example, consider a scenario where a truck is connected to a car by a rope, ready to tow it along a road. When no external force is applied by the truck, the car remains stationary and is said to be in static equilibrium. In this case, the forces acting on the car, such as gravity and the...

