Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Dual Bioluminescence Imaging of Tumor Progression and Angiogenesis
Published on: August 1, 2019
The Intersection between Tumor Angiogenesis and Immune Suppression
Osama E Rahma1, F Stephen Hodi2
1Center for Immune-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Osamae_rahma@DFCI.harvard.edu.
Both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antiangiogenesis agents have changed the landscape of cancer treatment in the modern era. While antiangiogenesis agents have demonstrated activities in tumors with high vascularization, including renal cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer, the effect of ICIs has been seen mainly in immunologically recognized tumors, with highly immune-infiltrative lymphocytes. The main challenge in the drug development of ICIs is moving their activities to noninflamed tumors and overcoming resistance that is driven, in part, by the immune-suppressive microenvironment. Angiogenesis factors drive immune suppression by directly suppressing the antigen-presenting cells as well as immune effector cells or through augmenting the effect of regulatory T cells (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). Those suppressive immune cells can also drive angiogenesis, creating a vicious cycle of impaired immune activation. The combination of bevacizumab and ipilimumab was the first to show the promising effect of antiangiogenesis and ICIs. A plethora of similar combinations has entered the clinic since then, confirming the promising effects of such approach.
Both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antiangiogenesis agents have changed the landscape of cancer treatment in the modern era. While antiangiogenesis agents have demonstrated activities in tumors with high vascularization, including renal cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer, the effect of ICIs has been seen mainly in immunologically recognized tumors, with highly immune-infiltrative lymphocytes. The main challenge in the drug development of ICIs is moving their activities to noninflamed tumors and overcoming resistance that is driven, in part, by the immune-suppressive microenvironment. Angiogenesis factors drive immune suppression by directly suppressing the antigen-presenting cells as well as immune effector cells or through augmenting the effect of regulatory T cells (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). Those suppressive immune cells can also drive angiogenesis, creating a vicious cycle of impaired immune activation. The combination of bevacizumab and ipilimumab was the first to show the promising effect of antiangiogenesis and ICIs. A plethora of similar combinations has entered the clinic since then, confirming the promising effects of such approach.
More Related Videos
08:32Enrichment and Characterization of the Tumor Immune and Non-immune Microenvironments in Established Subcutaneous Murine Tumors
Published on: June 7, 2018
14:01Human In Vitro Suppression as Screening Tool for the Recognition of an Early State of Immune Imbalance
Published on: July 22, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Angiogenesis
What is the Immune System?
Humoral Immune Responses
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Antacids
However, this neutralization reaction between...
Active versus Passive Immunity
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...