Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Creating Adhesive and Soluble Gradients for Imaging Cell Migration with Fluorescence Microscopy
Published on: April 4, 2013
In vivo topology converts competition for cell-matrix adhesion into directional migration
Fernanda Bajanca1, Nadège Gouignard1, Charlotte Colle2
1Centre de Biologie du Développement (CBD), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse, Cedex 09, France.
Abstract:
When migrating in vivo, cells are exposed to numerous conflicting signals: chemokines, repellents, extracellular matrix, growth factors. The roles of several of these molecules have been studied individually in vitro or in vivo, but we have yet to understand how cells integrate them. To start addressing this question, we used the cephalic neural crest as a model system and looked at the roles of its best examples of positive and negative signals: stromal-cell derived factor 1 (Sdf1/Cxcl12) and class3-Semaphorins. Here we show that Sdf1 and Sema3A antagonistically control cell-matrix adhesion via opposite effects on Rac1 activity at the single cell level. Directional migration at the population level emerges as a result of global Semaphorin-dependent confinement and broad activation of adhesion by Sdf1 in the context of a biased Fibronectin distribution. These results indicate that uneven in vivo topology renders the need for precise distribution of secreted signals mostly dispensable.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration
Competition
The Extracellular Matrix
Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Adhesion
Capillary action is a result of water’s adhesive tendencies. When a narrow...

