Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

78.9K
Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
78.9K
RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

7.3K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
7.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

100.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
100.6K
Chromatin Structure and RNA Splicing02:41

Chromatin Structure and RNA Splicing

3.4K
3.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.1K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.1K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

45.6K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
45.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probabilistic RNA designability via interpretable ensemble approximation and dynamic decomposition.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Computational Resources for Molecular Biology 2026.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same author

Reparameterization of the Amber RNA Force Field Non-Bonded Terms.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Nearest Neighbor Parameters for Estimating the Folding Stability of RNA Including Pseudouridine.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

RNA Folding Nearest Neighbor Parameters Including the Modification 1-Methyl-Pseudouridine.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Motif server: web server for undesignable RNA motifs and structures.

Journal of molecular biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

32.2K

How to benchmark RNA secondary structure prediction accuracy.

David H Mathews1

  • 1Center for RNA Biology, Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, and Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 712, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Methods (San Diego, Calif.)
|April 6, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Accurate RNA secondary structure prediction is crucial. This review outlines best practices for benchmarking new prediction methods, focusing on data selection, accuracy metrics, and statistical validation for reliable comparisons.

Keywords:
Comparative sequence analysisRNA folding

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

32.2K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • RNA secondary structure prediction is a fundamental tool in molecular biology.
  • New computational methods are continually developed to improve prediction accuracy.
  • Benchmarking is essential for evaluating and comparing these new RNA structure prediction algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and define best practices for benchmarking RNA secondary structure prediction methods.
  • To provide guidelines for selecting appropriate datasets and metrics for accuracy assessment.
  • To emphasize the importance of statistical significance and flexibility in evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of criteria for selecting representative benchmarking datasets.
  • Analysis of various metrics for quantifying prediction accuracy (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, MCC).
  • Highlighting the need for statistical testing to determine significant performance differences.

Main Results:

  • Identified key factors influencing benchmark reliability, including dataset choice and metric selection.
  • Emphasized the necessity of considering pair flexibility in evaluating predicted structures.
  • Stressed the importance of rigorous statistical analysis for validating method improvements.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to standardized benchmarking practices ensures reliable evaluation of RNA secondary structure prediction tools.
  • Improved benchmarking will accelerate the development of more accurate and robust prediction algorithms.
  • Consistent evaluation methodologies are vital for the advancement of RNA bioinformatics research.