Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
Published on: July 22, 2025
Assessing Computational Model Credibility Using a Risk-Based Framework: Application to Hemolysis in Centrifugal Blood
Tina M Morrison1, Prasanna Hariharan1, Chloe M Funkhouser2
1From the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
A new framework establishes credibility for computational models in medical device design, ensuring validation requirements align with device risk. This risk-informed approach enhances regulatory acceptance for medical device innovation.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Science
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Medical device manufacturers traditionally rely on internal best practices for computational modeling.
- A lack of consensus on model validation standards impedes broader acceptance, especially in regulatory contexts.
- The US Food and Drug Administration and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) partnered to develop a structured approach for computational model credibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce the ASME V&V 40 standard for establishing computational model credibility in medical device design.
- To present a risk-informed credibility assessment framework where validation requirements are proportional to the model's associated risk.
- To illustrate the application of this framework using a centrifugal blood pump model.
Main Methods:
- Development of a risk-informed credibility assessment framework by the ASME V&V 40 Subcommittee.
- Application of the framework to a generic centrifugal blood pump model.
- Evaluation of model credibility requirements based on different contexts of use and associated risks.
Main Results:
- The framework demonstrates that computational model credibility requirements should be commensurate with the risk of model use.
- Experimental evidence, such as in vitro testing, can effectively support computational modeling for medical device evaluation.
- Different contexts of use for the same model necessitate varying Verification and Validation (V&V) activities and outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The ASME V&V 40 standard provides a structured, risk-informed approach to computational model validation for medical devices.
- This framework facilitates regulatory acceptance by standardizing the evidentiary requirements for model credibility.
- The study highlights the importance of tailoring V&V efforts to the specific risks associated with the intended use of computational models in medical device development.
Related Concept Videos
Centrifugation
ATP Driven Pumps III: V-type Pumps
The peripheral or cytosolic V1 domain with eight subunits is involved in ATP hydrolysis. The integral or transmembrane V0 domain containing at least five subunits...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
ATP Driven Pumps II: P-type Pumps
A typical P-type pump has three cytosolic domains: nucleotide-binding (N), phosphorylation (P), and activator (A) domains. These domains are connected to the membrane-spanning helices by short amino acid segments. ATP hydrolysis and covalent phosphoenzyme intermediate formation are crucial parts of the catalytic cycle. At the highly...
Centrifugal Force
Pumped Concrete
For direct-acting pumps, the concrete enters the pump via the inlet valve under the action of gravity and suction created by the movement of the piston. This concrete is then forced into the pipeline and out through the outlet valve by the forward movement...

