Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.4K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.4K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.8K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.8K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
Energy to Drive Translocation01:37

Energy to Drive Translocation

2.7K
Mitochondrial protein import is powered by two distinct energy sources: ATP hydrolysis and electrochemical potential across the inner membrane. Newly synthesized precursors are bound by cytosolic chaperones of the Hsp70 family, which guide them to the import receptors on the mitochondrial surface. Utilizing the energy of ATP hydrolysis, Hsp70 chaperones transfer these precursors to the TOM receptors on the mitochondrial outer membrane.
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
2.7K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

507
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
507
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

6.4K
Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-design and usability evaluation of a pilot module to support health literacy development in young people with cerebral palsy: A consumer-led approach.

Disability and health journal·2026
Same author

Disinformation elicits learning biases.

eLife·2026
Same author

Distinct roles of hippocampus and neocortex in symbolic compositional generalization.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Human curriculum learning of a cue combination task.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Technological <i>folie à deux</i>: feedback loops between AI chatbots and mental health.

Nature. Mental health·2026
Same author

Visual working memory for real-world objects is resistant to visual but vulnerable to semantic interference.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.9K

Human noise blindness drives suboptimal cognitive inference.

Santiago Herce Castañón1,2, Rani Moran3,4, Jacqueline Ding5

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK. s.hercecastanon@gmail.com.

Nature Communications
|April 14, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans are good at sensorimotor tasks but make biased cognitive judgments. This study shows cognitive biases arise from ignoring noise during information integration, not sensory encoding.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.6K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.9K
Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.6K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational modeling

Background:

  • Humans exhibit near-optimal sensorimotor judgments but systematic biases in cognitive judgments.
  • A key question is whether these cognitive biases stem from sensory encoding or later information integration processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that humans are blind to noise during cognitive information integration.
  • To investigate the source of the
  • optimality gap
  • in human cognitive judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Six psychophysical experiments involving human observers judging the average orientation of contrast gratings.
  • Manipulation of stimulus contrast (encoding noise) and orientation variability (integration noise).
  • Comparison of human performance with a Bayesian model blind to integration noise.

Main Results:

  • Participants adapted near-optimally to changes in encoding noise.
  • Increased integration noise led to suboptimal behaviors, including ignoring base rates and excessive confidence.
  • Suboptimal behaviors were accurately predicted by a Bayesian model that disregarded integration noise.

Conclusions:

  • The "optimality gap" in human cognitive judgments is primarily due to insensitivity to noise during information integration.
  • A computationally grounded explanation for suboptimal cognitive inference is provided.
  • Findings highlight the distinct processing of sensory encoding versus cognitive integration noise.