Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Enrichment of Mammalian Tissues and Xenopus Oocytes with Cholesterol
Published on: March 25, 2020
Guidelines impact cholesterol management
Stephanie Yu1, Kiumars Zolfaghari2, Karen L Rascati3
1Department of Pharmacy, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple TX, USA.
Insights
High-intensity statin use increased after 2013 guidelines, but low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels remained unchanged. This suggests current statin guidelines may not be effectively lowering LDL-C in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Public Health
Background:
- The 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines recommended increased high-intensity statin use for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) management.
- Previous observations noted a rise in high-intensity statin prescriptions but no significant change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels post-guideline release.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate statin therapy goal achievement in ASCVD patients before and up to four years after the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines.
- To compare outcomes against prior LDL-C goals of <70 mg/dL and <100 mg/dL.
Main Methods:
- A single-system cohort study analyzed medical records, lab results, and claims data from November 2012 to October 2017.
- Propensity score-matched analyses were conducted on adult patients with at least one statin claim and an ASCVD diagnosis.
Main Results:
- High-intensity statin use in 1938 ASCVD patients significantly increased from 24% in 2013 to 49% in 2016.
- Subspecialist management correlated with a 13-22% higher increase in high-intensity statin use compared to primary care.
- Mean LDL-C levels showed no significant change, fluctuating between 80-85 mg/dL, and goal attainment rates for LDL-C <70 mg/dL (51-56%) and <100 mg/dL (77-85%) remained stable.
Conclusions:
- High-intensity statin use significantly increased post-2013 ACC/AHA guidelines, particularly under subspecialist care.
- Despite increased statin intensity, mean LDL-C levels and goal attainment did not improve, indicating a potential gap in achieving therapeutic targets.
Background:
Previous research demonstrates increased utilization of high-intensity statins, but unchanged low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, immediately after the 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) guideline release.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to determine achievement of statin therapy goals in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) before and up to 4 years after the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline release compared with LDL-C goals of <70 mg/dL and <100 mg/dL previously recommended by other professional societies.
Methods:
The single-system cohort study used medical records, laboratory results, and claims data (November 2012-October 2017) of adults with ≥1 claim for a statin, ≥1 ASCVD diagnosis in propensity score-matched analyses.
Results:
Among 1938 patients (mean age 70 ± 11, 48% female) with ASCVD, the percentage on high-intensity statin therapy significantly increased over time: 24% in 2013, 34% 2014, 42% 2015, and 49% 2016 (P < .0001). The increase in high-intensity statin use was 13 to 22% higher among patients managed by subspecialists (cardiologist and endocrinologists) compared with those managed by primary care providers. Mean LDL-C level was slightly, but not significantly, lower in 2013 (80 mg/dL) than in other years: 85 mg/dL in 2014, 83 mg/dL in 2015, and 82 mg/dL in 2016. The proportion of patients reaching LDL-C goals ranged from 51% to 56% for the <70 mg/dL target and 77% to 85% for the <100 mg/dL target over time.
Conclusion:
High-intensity statin use among secondary prevention patients increased significantly immediately after the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines release, primarily in those managed by subspecialists. However, the mean LDL-C and the proportion of patients reaching LDL-C < 70 mg/dL and < 100 mg/dL remain unchanged across comparison cohorts.
Related Concept Videos
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

