Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

3D-Neuronavigation In Vivo Through a Patient's Brain During a Spontaneous Migraine Headache
Published on: June 2, 2014
Erenumab in chronic migraine: Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized double-blind study
Richard B Lipton1, Stewart J Tepper2, Uwe Reuter2
1From the Department of Neurology (R.B.L.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH; Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Jefferson Headache Center (S.S.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Sutter Health (W.F.S.), Walnut Creek, CA; and Amgen Inc. (J.N., D.K.L., P.D., S.C., D.D.M., R.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA. Richard.Lipton@einstein.yu.edu.
Objective:
To determine the effect of erenumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), headache impact, and disability in patients with chronic migraine (CM).
Methods:
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 667 adults with CM were randomized (3:2:2) to placebo or erenumab (70 or 140 mg monthly). Exploratory endpoints included migraine-specific HRQoL (Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [MSQ]), headache impact (Headache Impact Test-6 [HIT-6]), migraine-related disability (Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS] test), and pain interference (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Pain Interference Scale short form 6b).
Results:
Improvements were observed for all endpoints in both erenumab groups at month 3, with greater changes relative to placebo observed at month 1 for many outcomes. All 3 MSQ domains were improved from baseline with treatment differences for both doses exceeding minimally important differences established for MSQ-role function-restrictive (≥3.2) and MSQ-emotional functioning (≥7.5) and for MSQ-role function-preventive (≥4.5) for erenumab 140 mg. Changes from baseline in HIT-6 scores at month 3 were -5.6 for both doses vs -3.1 for placebo. MIDAS scores at month 3 improved by -19.4 days for 70 mg and -19.8 days for 140 mg vs -7.5 days for placebo. Individual-level minimally important difference was achieved by larger proportions of erenumab-treated participants than placebo for all MSQ domains and HIT-6. Lower proportions of erenumab-treated participants had MIDAS scores of severe (≥21) or very severe (≥41) or PROMIS scores ≥60 at month 3.
Conclusions:
Erenumab-treated patients with CM experienced clinically relevant improvements across a broad range of patient-reported outcomes.
Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier:
NCT02066415.
Classification Of Evidence:
This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CM, erenumab treatment improves HRQoL, headache impact, and disability.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Data Reporting and Recording
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Random Error

