Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Ranking of stroke and cardiovascular risk factors for an optimal risk calculator design: Logistic regression approach
Elisa Cuadrado-Godia1, Ankush D Jamthikar2, Deep Gupta2
1Department of Neurology, IMIM - Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
A new cardiovascular risk calculator, AtheroEdge composite risk score (AECRS1.0), incorporating carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes (CUSIP) significantly improved cardiovascular disease risk prediction compared to conventional methods.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CCVRFs) and carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes (CUSIP) are independently linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
- Integrating CCVRFs with CUSIP may enhance CVD risk prediction accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To rank 26 cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors, combining CCVRFs and CUSIP.
- To design and benchmark an optimal risk calculator, AtheroEdge composite risk score (AECRS1.0), against seven conventional CVR calculators.
Main Methods:
- Ranked 26 CVR factors using multivariate logistic regression to compute odds ratios (OR).
- Evaluated eight types of 10-year risk calculators using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
- Validated results using SPSS, MEDCALC, and STATA software.
Main Results:
- Carotid phenotypes, specifically intima-media thickness variability (IMTV) and IMTV10yr, were highly influential for left and right common carotid arteries (CCA).
- AECRS1.0 and AECRS1.010yr showed the most significant OR for mean CCA.
- AECRS1.010yr achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.904, outperforming seven conventional calculators.
Conclusions:
- The AECRS1.010yr calculator demonstrated superior performance in cardiovascular risk prediction.
- The integration of CUSIP within the AECRS1.010yr model was key to its enhanced predictive capability and top ranking.
Purpose:
Conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CCVRFs) and carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes (CUSIP) are independently associated with long-term risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. In this study, 26 cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors which consisted of a combination of CCVRFs and CUSIP together were ranked. Further, an optimal risk calculator using AtheroEdge composite risk score (AECRS1.0) was designed and benchmarked against seven conventional CV risk (CVR) calculators.
Methods:
Two types of ranking were performed: (i) ranking of 26 CVR factors and (ii) ranking of eight types of 10-year risk calculators. In the first case, multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratio (OR) and in the second, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the performance of eight types of CVR calculators using SPSS23.0 and MEDCALC12.0 with validation against STATA15.0.
Results:
The left and right common carotid arteries (CCA) of 202 Japanese patients were examined to obtain 404 ultrasound scans. CUSIP ranked in the top 50% of the 26 covariates. Intima-media thickness variability (IMTV) and IMTV10yr were the most influential carotid phenotypes for left CCA (OR = 250, P < 0.0001 and OR = 207, P < 0.0001 respectively) and right CCA (OR = 1614, P < 0.0001 and OR = 626, P < 0.0001 respectively). However, for the mean CCA, AECRS1.0 and AECRS1.010yr reported the most highly significant OR among all the CVR factors (OR = 1.073, P < 0.0001 and OR = 1.104, P < 0.0001). AECRS1.010yr also reported highest area-under-the-curve (AUC = 0.904, P < 0.0001) compared to seven types of conventional calculators. Age and glycated haemoglobin reported highest OR (1.96, P < 0.0001 and 1.05, P = 0.012) among all other CCVRFs.
Conclusion:
AECRS1.010yr demonstrated the best performance due to presence of CUSIP and ranked at the first place with highest AUC.
More Related Videos
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
19:15Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Relative Risk
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Regression Toward the Mean
Group Design
Ranks