Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
Published on: April 29, 2007
Children lose confidence in their potential to "be scientists," but not in their capacity to "do science"
Ryan F Lei1, Emily R Green1, Sarah-Jane Leslie2
1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY.
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Science Education
- STEM Engagement
Background:
- Interest and self-efficacy in science often decline during middle childhood.
- This decline disproportionately affects underrepresented groups, including girls and minority children.
- Existing research highlights the need for interventions to sustain science engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how framing science activities influences children's interest and self-efficacy.
- To compare the impact of "doing science" versus "being a scientist" on engagement.
- To explore the role of inclusivity in children's perceptions of science.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal and cross-sectional study with 306 children aged 6-11.
- Assessed children's interest and efficacy beliefs regarding science.
- Utilized mediation analyses to examine the effects of action-focused language.
Main Results:
- Children showed declining interest in "being scientists" but maintained interest in "doing science."
- Action-focused language ("doing science") fostered greater interest and efficacy than identity-focused language ("being a scientist").
- Perceived inclusivity of science practitioners mediated the positive effects of action framing.
Conclusions:
- Framing science through action and participation, rather than identity, enhances engagement.
- Action-focused language promotes a more inclusive view of science, benefiting diverse learners.
- Educational strategies should emphasize "doing science" to foster sustained interest and efficacy.
Abstract:
Over the course of middle childhood, children's interest and beliefs about their own capacities for success in science often decline. This pernicious decline is especially evident among underrepresented groups, including girls, members of some racial and ethnic minorities, and children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. The present research (N = 306, ages 6-11) found that while children lose interest and feelings of efficacy about their potential to "be scientists" across middle childhood, they maintain more robust interest and efficacy about "doing science." These patterns were confirmed in both longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses; effects were stable or increased across time and age. Mediation analyses revealed that the positive effect of action framing is partially accounted for by children's views that the group of people who do science is more inclusive than the category of scientists. These findings suggest that using action-focused language to encourage children in science is more inclusive and may lead to more science engagement across middle childhood than language that emphasizes scientists as an identity category. Implications for educational practices will be discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the concrete...
The Nativist Approach
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Growth versus Fixed Mindset

