Effects of cochlear implants on otolith function as evaluated by vestibulo-ocular reflex and vestibular evoked...

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the insertion of an implant into the cochlea is accompanied by a deterioration in otolith function. Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP and oVEMP) and linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (lVOR) during eccentric rotation were assessed before and after cochlear implantation (CI) to evaluate otolith function.

Twelve patients with bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss who had undergone CI surgery in our hospital between May 2016 and November 2017 were included in this study. cVEMP and oVEMP were assessed using the asymmetry ratio (AR), calculated with the following formula: [(peak-to-peak amplitude calculated as the sum of the p13 and n23 amplitudes in the non-operated side) - (that in the operated side)]/[(that in the non-operated side) + (that in the operated side)]. The ratio of VOR gain during eccentric rotation against VOR gain during center rotation was used to assess lVOR. For eccentric rotation, patients were rotated while displaced from the axis of rotation. At the same time, linear acceleration stimulated the utricle and induced lVOR. All patients underwent cVEMP and oVEMP tests and center and eccentric rotation tests before and about 30days after CI surgery.

Three patients with absent cVEMP responses before surgery were excluded, leaving pre-surgery cVEMP results for 9/12 patients. In five of these patients, the AR of cVEMP increased after CI, indicating that saccular function, as evaluated by cVEMP, did not deteriorate significantly postoperatively. One patient with an absent oVEMP response before CI was excluded, leaving pre-surgery oVEMP results for 11/12 patients. In 10 of these patients, the AR of oVEMP increased after CI surgery, indicating that utricular function, as evaluated by oVEMP, deteriorated significantly postoperatively. However, because the ratio of VOR gain during eccentric rotation against VOR gain during center rotation did not become worse after CI, utricular function, as evaluated by lVOR, did not deteriorate significantly postoperatively. Symptoms of vertigo became worse after CI in two of the 12 patients.

CI does not cause a deterioration in saccular function, as evaluated by cVEMP. Although CI does cause a deterioration in utricular function in oVEMP tests, this is not consistent in lVOR tests. These results indicate that CI causes a slight deterioration in utricular function that is insufficient to cause vertigo or deterioration of lVOR.