Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

922
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
922
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

503
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
503
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

938
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
938
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

466
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
466
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Screening the optimal rTSMS frequency to orchestrate immune-fibrotic remodeling for adult spinal cord repair.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

HIF-1α-mediated mitochondrial autophagy in the post-treatment protective effect of thyroxine against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Machine Learning-Assisted 3D Envelope-Enhanced SERS Platform for Detection and Classification of Multiple Coexisting Pollutants.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Documentation-derived nursing process indicators and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI: A cohort study.

Medicine·2026
Same author

Dual chaotic encryption method for wireless communication privacy data based on deep learning.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Failing Others' Expectations: Negative Emotions and Behavior Change in Daily Life.

Affective science·2026
Same journal

Limits to Language Prediction: Findings From Diverse Populations.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

There Is More Than Meets the Eye: The Dual Role of Perception in Shaping Color Lexicons.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Gesture Use Across Different Concepts: Focusing on Cross-Linguistic Diversity.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Exploring Amazonian Cognitive Diversity at Chana Research Station.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Do (We Think That) Plants Have Agency?

Topics in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Modeling Morality in 3-D: Decision-Making, Judgment, and Inference.

Hongbo Yu1,2, Jenifer Z Siegel1,2, Molly J Crockett2

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.

Topics in Cognitive Science
|May 2, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a computational framework to understand moral decision-making, judgment, and inference. It integrates harm aversion with Bayesian models to explore the balance between self-interest and morality.

Keywords:
Computational modelsHarm aversionMoral cognitionMoral decision‐makingMoral inferenceMoral judgment

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Moral Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Moral cognition involves decision-making, judgment, and inference, often studied in isolation.
  • Understanding the interplay between selfish interests and moral considerations is a fundamental human challenge.
  • Existing research often treats moral decision-making, judgment, and inference independently.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unified computational framework for investigating moral decision-making, judgment, and inference.
  • To explore the role of harm aversion in moral cognition.
  • To integrate economic utility and Bayesian reinforcement learning models for a comprehensive analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational framework integrating economic utility models of harm aversion.
  • Incorporated Bayesian reinforcement learning models to represent beliefs about others' harm aversion.
  • Applied the framework to analyze moral decision-making, judgment, and inference.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework offers a unified approach to studying multiple dimensions of moral cognition.
  • Harm aversion is identified as a core component influencing moral sentiments and decisions.
  • The model provides insights into the mechanisms underlying moral hypocrisy.

Conclusions:

  • A single computational framework can effectively integrate and analyze diverse aspects of moral cognition.
  • Understanding harm aversion and beliefs about others' harm aversion is crucial for explaining moral behavior.
  • This approach advances the study of moral decision-making, judgment, and inference by bridging independent research areas.