Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Influence of Hybrid Perovskite Fabrication Methods on Film Formation, Electronic Structure, and Solar Cell Performance
Published on: February 27, 2017
The Influence of the Electronic Structure Method on Intersystem Crossing Dynamics. The Case of Thioformaldehyde
Sebastian Mai1, Andrew J Atkins1, Felix Plasser1
1Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry , University of Vienna , Währinger Straß 17 , 1090 Vienna , Austria.
Abstract:
The ability of different electronic structure methods to correctly describe intersystem crossing dynamics is evaluated, using thioformaldehyde as a test case. Mischievously, all methods considered-ranging from the multireference methods MRCISD, MS-CASPT2, or SA-CASSCF, to the single-reference methods ADC(2), CC2, and TDDFT in different flavors-provide the same state ordering and energies of the low-lying singlet and triplet electronic excited states within an acceptable error of 0.2-0.3 eV. However, the outcome of the nonadiabatic simulations after excitation to the lowest S1 (1 nπ*) state are dramatically different. While MS-CASPT2, ADC(2), BP86, and PBE do not transfer population to the triplet states within 500 fs-consistent with experimental evidence-SA-CASSCF, B3LYP, and BHHLYP predict intersystem crossing yields between 3% and 21% within the same time. The different excited state dynamics can be rationalized by inspecting potential energy profiles along the C-S bond stretch mode and single-triplet energy gaps. It is found that already at a C-S bond length of 1.9 Å, all the single-reference methods struggle to describe the correct asymptotic behavior of the potentials. Moreover, some methods, including SA-CASSCF, obtain incorrect 1 nπ*-3 ππ* energy gaps, leading to compensation of errors (ADC(2), BP86, PBE), or wrong dynamics (SA-CASSCF, B3LYP, BHHLYP). Only the accurate MRCISD and MS-CASPT2 methods are able to describe the C-S bond correctly and thus able to deliver the correct potential energy surfaces and dynamics for the right reason. A correlation with the amount of Hartree-Fock exchange in the density functional and the ease to access the 3 ππ* state from the 1 nπ* are able to explain the different behavior observed for GGA and hybrid functionals. It is thus illustrated that even in the case of a simple molecule, like CH2S, the sole assessment of vertical excitation energies as reliability predictors for nonadiabatic dynamics is inadequate. The reason is that ISC does not occur at the FC geometry, but rather at distorted geometries where the singlet-triplet gaps become small. Hence, a characterization of the potential energy surfaces beyond the Franck-Condon region is mandatory.
Related Concept Videos
Electronic Structure of Atoms
An atom comprises protons and neutrons, which are contained inside the dense, central core called the nucleus, with electrons present around the nucleus. Taking into account the wave–particle duality of electrons and the uncertainty in position around the nucleus, quantum mechanics provides a more accurate model for the atomic structure. It describes atomic orbitals as the regions around the nucleus where electrons of discrete energy exist, characterized by four quantum...
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Crossing Over
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
Monohybrid Crosses
Cross-Sectional Research

