Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer at Early Stage with Laparoscopy
Published on: August 19, 2021
Lymph node count impacts survival following post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for non-seminomatous
Raj R Bhanvadia1, Joseph Rodriguez1, Aditya Bagrodia2
1Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate the prognostic significance of lymph node count (LNC) at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND) in metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Patients And Methods:
SEER (2000-2013, n = 572) and NCDB (2004-2013, n = 731) identified patients undergoing PC-RPLND for Stage II and III NSGCT. Correlation between linear or categorial variables and LNC was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation or Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks. Patients were stratified by ≤20, 21-40, and >40 LNs for Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of LNC at PC-RPLND with overall mortality (OM) in the NCDB and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in the SEER database. The relationship between LNC and OM or CSM was also modelled as a non-linear function to determine a threshold for survival benefit.
Results:
Amongst all patients, the median (interquartile range) LNC was 17 (3-26) LNs in the NCDB, and 18 (6-31) LNs in the SEER database. More recent diagnosis year, higher hospital volume, higher median income, private insurance status, and positive LNC were associated with greater total LNC in one or both databases (P < 0.05). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, >40 LNs was associated with 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) of 99% and overall survival (OS) of 96%, whereas ≤20 LNs had a 5-year CSS of 91% and OS of 78% (CSS, P = 0.04; OS, P < 0.01). Risk-adjusted Cox model showed increasing LNC (per node) was inversely associated with OM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.98; P < 0.01) and CSM (HR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = 0.01). Non-linear modelling showed the greatest benefit in OM at between 10 and 20 LNs, but continued survival benefit for OM and CSM beyond 20 LNs.
Conclusions:
Greater LNC during PC-RPLND appears to be associated with improved CSS and OS in NSGCT. Our data support the role of thorough RPLND for post-chemotherapy metastatic NSGCT.
More Related Videos
12:53Collection and Processing of Lymph Nodes from Large Animals for RNA Analysis: Preparing for Lymph Node Transcriptomic Studies of Large Animal Species
Published on: May 19, 2018
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Detailed Structure and Function of Lymph Nodes
From a histological perspective, lymph nodes can be split into two main areas: the superficial cortex and the deep medulla. The outer cortex is populated by dendritic cells, macrophages, and B lymphocytes, which are densely packed into follicles. When these B-lymphocytes are presented...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis