Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.5K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.5K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.1K
Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation01:27

Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation

548
Power motivation and achievement motivation are two essential social motives identified by psychologist David McClelland. These motives influence behavior in various personal and professional contexts, shaping how individuals interact with others and pursue their goals.
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
548
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

55.6K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
55.6K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation: A replication.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention.

Laterality·2024
Same author

Time-Perception Deficits in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Developmental neuropsychology·2023
Same author

Sex differences in curve tracing and the Mental Rotations Test.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2023
Same author

Accident proneness, laterality, and time estimation.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

Picking up the pieces: Sex differences in mechanisms of curve tracing.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2021
Same journal

The gendered burden of natural disasters: Evidence from two catastrophic earthquakes in Türkiye.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Epidemiologic approaches to policy research - examinations of single policies, policy clusters, and policy climates: Conceptualization, measurement, and analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Time to check up: Retirement and cancer screening in Australia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

When the platform becomes a co-author: Self-writing about HPV vaccination on social media as technologies of the self.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Erratum to "Defensive decoupling: Tensions and contradictions in a US surgical safety intervention" [Soc. Sci. Med. 403 (2026) 119421].

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Eating disorder severity and treatment outcome across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status: Intersectional inequities in a clinical sample.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.9K

Implications for school achievement and causality: A commentary.

Daniel Voyer1, Susan D Voyer1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Canada.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|May 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sex differences in standardized test scores impact health outcomes, but only in males. Further research is needed to establish causality between these health disparities and academic achievement gaps.

Keywords:
Health outcomesSchool achievementSex differences

More Related Videos

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.4K
Tuning Degradation to Achieve Specific and Efficient Protein Depletion
05:11

Tuning Degradation to Achieve Specific and Efficient Protein Depletion

Published on: July 20, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
11:33

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

43.9K
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.4K
Tuning Degradation to Achieve Specific and Efficient Protein Depletion
05:11

Tuning Degradation to Achieve Specific and Efficient Protein Depletion

Published on: July 20, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Education
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Sex-related discrepancies in standardized test performance are documented.
  • Previous research suggests a link between these discrepancies and health outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comment on the findings by Levine et al. (2019) regarding sex differences in test performance and health.
  • To explore implications for educators and future research on sex differences in academic achievement.
  • To evaluate the causal claims made in the original study.

Main Methods:

  • Commentary and critical analysis of existing research.
  • Review of conditions necessary for establishing causality.
  • Proposal for future research design.

Main Results:

  • The relationship between test score discrepancies and health outcomes appears significant only in males.
  • Current evidence is insufficient to establish a causal link.

Conclusions:

  • The findings have significant implications for understanding sex differences in education and health.
  • Further research is required, particularly studies that can establish temporal order, to determine causality.