Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Between-speaker variability and temporal organization of the first formant
Lei He1, Yu Zhang2, Volker Dellwo2
1Department of Linguistics, University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstrasse 19-23, DE-72074, Tübingen, Germanylei.he@philosophie.uni-tuebingen.de.
Negative first formant (F1) dynamics, representing vocalic F1 decreases, explained more speaker variability than positive dynamics. This finding aligns with prior research on vocal intensity, suggesting idiosyncratic articulation influences speech patterns.
Area of Science:
- Acoustic phonetics
- Speech production
- Speaker variability
Background:
- Vocalic intervals exhibit dynamic changes in acoustic properties.
- First formant (F1) trajectories, crucial for vowel perception, can be analyzed for their increasing (positive) and decreasing (negative) dynamics.
- Understanding the factors contributing to between-speaker variability in speech is essential for phonetics and speech technology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether positive or negative first formant (F1) dynamics better explain between-speaker variability.
- To compare the explanatory power of F1 dynamics with previously studied intensity dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Vocalic intervals were analyzed for their F1 trajectories.
- F1 trajectories were divided into positive (increasing) and negative (decreasing) dynamics.
- Measures including mean, standard deviation, and sequential variability were calculated for both positive and negative F1 dynamics.
- The proportion of between-speaker variability explained by these measures was assessed.
Main Results:
- Measures of negative F1 dynamics explained a greater proportion of between-speaker variability compared to positive F1 dynamics.
- This finding was highly congruent with a previous study demonstrating similar results for intensity dynamics.
- The results suggest that the way speakers decrease their F1 is a more distinguishing characteristic than how they increase it.
Conclusions:
- Negative F1 dynamics are a significant factor in explaining between-speaker variability in speech.
- Speaker-specific articulation patterns, particularly in the execution of F1 decreases, likely underlie these observed differences.
- The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the acoustic correlates of speaker identity.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Work and Energy for Variable Forces
Levels of Organization
Molecules Are Composed of Atoms, and Biomolecules Are Assembled from Molecules:
The most basic levels include atoms, molecules, and biomolecules. Atoms, the smallest unit of ordinary matter, are composed of a nucleus and electrons. Molecules...
Accessory Organs

