Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

In Vitro Enzyme Measurement to Test Pharmacological Chaperone Responsiveness in Fabry and Pompe Disease
Published on: December 20, 2017
Cochleovestibular manifestations in Fabry disease: Importance of screening and systematic ENT evaluation
C Eyermann1, T Raguin1, D Rohmer1
1Service d'ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU de Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Objectives:
Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked inherited lysosomal storage disease. It is a multisystem pathology that can include ENT disorders. The aim of the present study was to investigate the cochleovestibular manifestations of FD, in order to show the importance of screening and systematic ENT evaluation.
Material And Methods:
A single-center retrospective study included 14 male and 23 female FD patients. Hearing impairment was defined as hearing loss greater than the 90th percentile for at least one frequency. Vestibular impairment was defined by lateral semicircular canal dysfunction. Age, ongoing enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and organic (renal, cardiac and cerebrovascular) complications were used as severity markers.
Results:
Hearing impairment was found in 62.6% of cases, mostly at high frequencies, and was associated with age, ERT, and cardiac and cerebrovascular disorder. It affected 46.7% of asymptomatic adult patients. Vestibular impairment was found in 56% of cases, associated with age; it affected two-thirds of ERT patients, more than 60% of patients with organic complications, and 50% of asymptomatic adult patients.
Conclusions:
More than half of patients had ENT involvement. All FD patients should undergo early ENT screening for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes. Systematic complete ENT follow-up with auditory and vestibular evaluation should be performed regularly, even for heterozygous women.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Random and Systematic Errors

