Need for better severity indexes of acute myocardial infarction under diagnosis-related groups

Clinical, demographic and administrative data, including length of stay and institutional charges, were examined for 219 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Neither length of stay nor charges differed among AMI patients with or without cardiovascular complications as defined by Medicare's diagnosis-related group (DRG) categories (DRG 121 and 122, respectively) for patients who are discharged alive. Myocardial enzyme peak levels are the best predictors of hospital resource consumption for patients with AMI when considered alone or in combination with other factors. The "cardiovascular complications" designated by discharge diagnoses did not reflect resource consumption in our patient population. Sixteen percent of the patients studied underwent cardiac catheterization during hospitalization. These patients stayed in the hospital longer and incurred 70% higher charges; nevertheless, they were grouped with the remaining AMI patients in the current DRG formulation. Clinical evaluations such as cardiovascular complications are subject to interpretation, and are therefore less credible than enzyme measurements for recognizing the severity of a patient's AMI. Reimbursement based on objective measurements may avoid payment inequities.