Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
Published on: August 18, 2020
Gender differences of patients at-risk for psychosis regarding symptomatology, drug use, comorbidity and functioning
Stephanie Menghini-Müller1, Erich Studerus2, Sarah Ittig2
1Center for Gender Research and Early Detection, University of Basel Psychiatric Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Basel, Switzerland.
Background:
Gender differences in symptomatology in chronic schizophrenia and first episode psychosis patients have often been reported. However, little is known about gender differences in those at risk of psychotic disorders. This study investigated gender differences in symptomatology, drug use, comorbidity (i.e. substance use, affective and anxiety disorders) and global functioning in patients with an at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis.
Methods:
The sample consisted of 336 ARMS patients (159 women) from the prodromal work package of the EUropean network of national schizophrenia networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI; 11 centers). Clinical symptoms, drug use, comorbidity and functioning were assessed at first presentation to an early detection center using structured interviews.
Results:
In unadjusted analyses, men were found to have significantly higher rates of negative symptoms and current cannabis use while women showed higher rates of general psychopathology and more often displayed comorbid affective and anxiety disorders. No gender differences were found for global functioning. The results generally did not change when corrected for possible cofounders (e.g. cannabis use). However, most differences did not withstand correction for multiple testing.
Conclusions:
Findings indicate that gender differences in symptomatology and comorbidity in ARMS are similar to those seen in overt psychosis and in healthy controls. However, observed differences are small and would only be reliably detected in studies with high statistical power. Moreover, such small effects would likely not be clinically meaningful.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
05:52Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis and Antipsychotic Drugs: Overview
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion