Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
Published on: February 28, 2025
Cadence impact on cardiopulmonary, metabolic and biomechanical loading during downhill running
Heather K Vincent1, Christopher Massengill1, Andrew Harris1
1University of Florida, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, UF Health Sports Performance Center, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
Background:
Distance runners can approach long descents with slow cadence and long steps, or a fast cadence with shorter steps. These approaches differentially affect mechanical loading and energy demand.
Research Question:
This study determined the cadence range in which biomechanical loads, caloric unit cost and energy cost were simultaneously minimized during downhill running (DR).
Methods:
Trained runners (N = 40; 25.6 ± 7.2 yr; 42.5% female) participated in this experimental study. Participants ran on an instrumented treadmill while wearing a portable gas analyzer during six conditions: control normal level running (LR) at 0 deg inclination (CON-0); control DR -6 deg inclinaton (CON-6); DR at cadences +/-5% and +/-10% different from CON-6. A motion analysis system was used to capture running motion, and an instrumented treadmill captured force data. Cardiopulmonary measures, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and biomechanical measures (temporal spatial parameters, peak ground reaction forces [GRF], vertical average loading rate [VALR], impulses) were calculated. Caloric unit cost and energy costs were standardized per unit distance.
Results:
Running at -10% cadence increased HR by 10 bpm compared to CON-6 (p < 0.0001). Vertical excursion of the center of mass and step length were greatest in the cadence -10% and least in the cadence +10% conditions (both p < 0.0001). RPEs were higher among all cadence conditions compared to CON-0 (p < 0.0001). Caloric unit costs were lowest in CON-6, and +/5% cadence conditions compared to the CON-0 and +/-10% conditions (-2.1% to -12.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). Peak GRF and VALR were not different among conditions; vertical impulses were greatest in the -10% condition compared to CON-0, CON-6 and +5% and +10% by 11.3-14.5% (p < .001).
Significance:
Changing cadence across level and downhill stretches is likely not necessary and may actually increase perceived effort of running. Running downhill at cadences that range +/-5% of preferred simultaneously minimize caloric unit cost and impulse loading.
More Related Videos
08:30Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test, Measurement of Lung Function, and Fixation of the Lung to Study the Impact of Obesity and Impaired Metabolism on Pulmonary Outcomes
Published on: March 15, 2018
08:08Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Mouse Model: A Novel Approach
Published on: September 22, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Impact Loading on a Cantilever Beam
When an object is dropped onto the free end of a cantilever, its potential energy due to gravity is...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
What is Metabolism?
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult